Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 1271 >>
Fred Gransville
I. The Fluoride Question
For decades, fluoride has had an uncontested official story: it is a beneficial, even benevolent substance—vital to healthy teeth. In toothpaste tubes to water supplies, fluoride has been presented as a dental wonder, the panacea for tooth decay. But is this portrait accurate, or are we denying the evil, lesser-known side of fluoride?
Establishment sources, including Snopes (Mikkelson, 2007) and the Anti-Defamation League (ADL, 2020), immediately dispel any suggestion that fluoride was used by the Nazis as a control agent in concentration camps. Such claims are labeled "debunked conspiracy theories," thereby silencing the debate. But when explored in greater depth, the unity and scope of these official refutations begin to disintegrate. What if fluoride, rather than a benign substance, is really a poisoned weapon—a material whose history is wrapped up with coercive control, chemical warfare, and chronic health effects?
Tracy Turner
#SCOTUScorruption #FascistAmerica #EndCitizensUnited
Bush started it. Obama enabled it. Trump perfected it. And the Court? It never checked power—it built it.
I. Opening Jab: The Judicial Illusion
"They wear robes to appear impartial. But they rule like monarchs—cloaked in corporate silk and sanctified by centuries of deception."
The average American still clings to the myth of the Supreme Court as an impartial temple of jurisprudence—a cold, austere citadel where "law" supersedes ideology, and justice is handed down like tablets from Mount Sinai. This fantasy persists not because it is true but because it is useful. It camouflages raw power in ceremonial pageantry. It converts oligarchic edicts into "legal precedent."
In reality, the Court has never functioned as a neutral arbiter. It has always been the legal wing of entrenched capital, an enforcement mechanism of aristocratic consensus masquerading as judicial restraint. Marbury v. Madison wasn't a triumph of constitutional clarity—it was a hostile seizure of interpretive authority. From Dred Scott to Citizens United, the Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled not in service to liberty but in favor of property, hierarchy, and the interests of war.
Dr. Vladislav B. Sotirovic
The focal questions about war
In dealing with both theoretical and practical points of view about war, at least six fundamental questions arise: 1) What is war?; 2) What types of war exist?; 3) Why do wars occur?; 4) What is the connection between war and justice?; 5) The question of war crimes?; and 6) Is it possible to replace war with the so-called “perpetual peace”?
Probably, up to today, the most used and reliable understanding of war is its short but powerful definition by Carl von Clausewitz:
“War is merely the continuation of politics by other means” [On War, 1832]. |
It can be considered the terrifying consequences if, in practice, Clausewitz’s term “merely” from a simple phrase about the war would be applied in the post-WWII nuclear era and the Cold War (for instance, the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962).
By Tracy Turner
What begins as an assault on immigrants ends as an assault on the Constitution itself.
The Constitution Is Not a Loophole
Come the summer of 2025, the sitting president of America is pushing the limits of constitutional tolerance yet again-but this time- not in a time of war, but under the pretense of “enforcing immigration policy.” The target isn't only unauthorized migrants; it's also the legal system that safeguards every individual within these borders-including citizens. And focus to this latest blow is one principle: due process. Removers are no longer confined to border regions but instead has turned into an interior campaign of militarized removals, bypassing court hearings and staged hearings.
What is dangerously becoming standard practice is state sanctioned force being used to strip individuals of their freedom without trial or any form of judicial scrutiny. Step by step, eroding one legal precedent after another disintegrating constitutional limits on power.
By Tracy Turner
I. The Faustian Bargain
“Kids can’t eat pronouns. Families can’t pay bills with gender-neutral bathrooms.”
Somewhere between Occupy Wall Street and “Latinx Heritage Month,” the Democratic Party lost the plot—and with it, the nation. In the wake of the 2008 financial collapse, a moment ripe for a New Deal–level moral reckoning, Democrats instead chose symbolism over substance, abstraction over bread, hashtags over housing. They waged war on the semiotics of gender while Walmart wages stagnated, and American infrastructure buckled like rusted bridges in the Rust Belt. They spoke of inclusion while excluding working-class concerns from the national stage.
This was not accidental. It was strategic neglect, wrapped in the velvet cloaks of progress. While Wall Street looted the Treasury and Main Street collapsed, elite Democrats and their media echo chambers channeled outrage toward language, identity categories, and Twitter micro-crimes. Real problems—failing schools, disappearing pensions, fentanyl-soaked Appalachia—were reduced to footnotes in a morality play that cast working-class skepticism as bigotry and populist frustration as “fascism.”
Fred Gransville
1. Russian Summer Offensive Advances on Multiple Axes
Fred Gransville
I. Introduction
The Lungs of the Earth Are Being Stabbed from All Sides
In June 2025, the Amazon and Orinoco basins—twin arteries of South America's ecological soul—are hemorrhaging under a coordinated assault. These are not isolated crimes of negligence. They are acts of premeditated ecocide, orchestrated by cartels, corporations, and complicit governments who regard ancient forest not as sacred biome, but as expendable inventory. Despite international pledges, ESG audits, and viral documentaries, the rate of destruction has accelerated, not slowed. The world’s largest rainforest, once home to a fifth of all terrestrial species, is careening toward irreversible collapse.
The Amazon lost over 1,500 square miles of forest in the first five months of 2025 alone—an area larger than New York City—with fires starting earlier and burning longer due to El Niño–driven drought and the rollback of land protections in frontier states like Pará and Rondônia (Associated Press, 2025a; INPE, 2025). Meanwhile, to the north, the Orinoco River basin—a system rarely mentioned in global headlines—is suffering a parallel catastrophe. Venezuela’s criminal mining economy, centered in the so-called Arco Minero del Orinoco, has turned once-pristine rivers into chemical morgues, laced with mercury, cyanide, and crude oil (RAISG, 2024; Global Witness, 2024).
Fred Gransville
How Politicians and Corporations Are Sacrificing the Arctic—And Our Future—For Profit
"Thousands of tired, nerve-shaken, over-civilized people are beginning to find out that going to the mountains is going home; that wildness is a necessity." —John Muir.
The Arctic as Earth's Sacred Wild
The Arctic is not a frontier—it is a sanctuary. Its pristine tundras, icy fjords, and sentient glaciers are not dead matter but living memory, regulating global currents, oxygen flows, and the planet's emotional register. For centuries, the Arctic stood as a distant sentinel, immune to the immediacies of profit and pillage. No longer. As the Arctic warms four times faster than the global average (Park et al., 2022), this last wild sanctuary is now ground zero in the war between survival and short-term extraction.
by Dr. Althea Mentes
I. Introduction
In the ever-evolving pharmacopeia of modern medicine, few substances have traveled from criminalized taboo to mainstream therapeutic darling as rapidly as cannabinoids. Once dismissed as the intoxicants of the counterculture, compounds derived from the cannabis plant are now in the process of being scientifically reevaluated with clinical rigor. This reevaluation is particularly crucial as global health systems, including but not limited to those in [specific countries or regions], stagger under rising rates of anxiety, sleep disorders, and neurodegenerative decline.
Robert David
Exposed: The hidden network of pro-Israel lobbyists infiltrating U.S. newsrooms to control narratives on Palestine—revealed in groundbreaking investigations.
Israeli Omertà of U.S. Press
I. The Perception Gap
Silencing Dissent opens with a stark question: Why does U.S. news coverage on Israel–Palestine often appear unbalanced—even as global media calls out bias? Despite mounting criticism from independent and international outlets, American mainstream channels repeatedly feature narratives that tilt pronouncedly pro-Israel.
Recent investigations prove this is not accidental. For instance, a MintPress News exposé revealed that hundreds of former lobbyists affiliated with AIPAC, StandWithUs, and CAMERA now hold influential positions in major outlets—including MSNBC, The New York Times, CNN, and Fox. These insiders, often without disclosing their prior affiliations, shape coverage of Middle East affairs from behind the scenes (MacLeod, 2025) [MintPress News]