Tracy Turner

#SCOTUScorruption #FascistAmerica #EndCitizensUnited

Bush started it. Obama enabled it. Trump perfected it. And the Court? It never checked power—it built it.

I. Opening Jab: The Judicial Illusion

"They wear robes to appear impartial. But they rule like monarchs—cloaked in corporate silk and sanctified by centuries of deception."

The average American still clings to the myth of the Supreme Court as an impartial temple of jurisprudence—a cold, austere citadel where "law" supersedes ideology, and justice is handed down like tablets from Mount Sinai. This fantasy persists not because it is true but because it is useful. It camouflages raw power in ceremonial pageantry. It converts oligarchic edicts into "legal precedent."

In reality, the Court has never functioned as a neutral arbiter. It has always been the legal wing of entrenched capital, an enforcement mechanism of aristocratic consensus masquerading as judicial restraint. Marbury v. Madison wasn't a triumph of constitutional clarity—it was a hostile seizure of interpretive authority. From Dred Scott to Citizens United, the Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled not in service to liberty but in favor of property, hierarchy, and the interests of war.

And yet, the delusion of separation lingers: that the judiciary "checks" the Presidency, that legal scholars operate independently of political cabals, and that robes neutralize greed. This mythology is America's most enduring lie—and its most dangerous.

What we have instead is a fascist convergence. Not in the theatrical sense of brownshirts and goose-stepping—but in the real-world mechanics of 21st-century authoritarianism:

• Corporate sovereignty usurping public will.


• Electoral ritual masking dynastic continuity.


• Legal precedent is used to shield predators and punish dissent.

The Three Faces of American Fascism

A. Aesthetic Fascism – The Theater

"The fascism you were taught to recognize: flags, slogans, mobs in red hats."

This is fascism as spectacle. It weaponizes identity, nostalgia, and fear. Think rallies, wall-building, book bans, and Christian nationalism. It looks like tyranny, but often distracts from the more durable fascism beneath.

• Style over substance


• Mobilizes emotion, not policy


• Distracts the public with pageantry

B. Procedural Fascism – The System

"Fascism in a robe, quoting precedent, signing your rights away in silence."

This form hides behind legal language and bureaucratic calm. It does not overthrow democracy—it rewrites its rules. Court rulings, deregulation, surveillance, voter suppression—all done within the frame of “law and order.”

• Authoritarianism by rulebook


• Codifies power grabs as "constitutional"


• Disempowers citizens while preserving appearances

C. State Corporatism – The Engine

"Where power wears a suit and cash buys law."

This is the merger of state and capital. Billionaires fund judges, presidents sell influence, and corporations dictate policy. It is fascism monetized: deregulate, privatize, and profit while the people are silenced.

• Public power for private gain


• Government as a wealth-extraction tool


• Courts and presidents serve capital, not citizens

In Fusion:

"Together, they are the fascist machine: image, law, and money working as one."

• Aesthetic distracts.


• Procedural legitimizes.


• Corporatism profits.

Until you name them all, you are chasing shadows—and democracy remains a performance, not a practice.

The U.S. Supreme Court no longer checks executive power—it corroborates it, ratifies it, and, where necessary, enables its most authoritarian expansions. The Presidency no longer answers to the people—it answers to the Court that blesses its abuses, retrofits its crimes with Latin, and then calls the result "constitutional law."

The illusion of judicial independence now functions as a smoke screen for fascist symbiosis. The President and the Court, whether wearing suits or robes, operate in unison—a binary weapon forged in backrooms and baptized in secrecy. Bush used it. Obama preserved it. Trump industrialized it. Biden fears to confront it. And the consequences have been catastrophic for the American experiment.

This isn't a war between branches. It's a fascist partnership.

And the only thing being "checked" is your bank balance, your voice, and your vote.

Chart 1: SCOTUS Procedures as Preemptive Acts of Fascism

Chart 2: POTUS Fascist Acts

Chart 3: Supreme Court Justices’ Enrichment & Conflicts of Interest

II. The Six-Robed Enforcers: Fraud by Oath, Fascism by Verdict

They took oaths under bright lights, hands raised, eyes rehearsed. They promised independence, humility, fidelity to precedent. But once robed, these six conservative justices revealed themselves as instruments of systemic predation—not interpreters of law, but authors of empire.

Their confirmations were theater. Their decisions are policy. Their loyalty is not to the Constitution but to the billionaires who groomed them, funded them, and now—profit from them.

Below is a dossier of betrayals in black robes—proof that these jurists were not confirmed through merit but installed through fraud.

1. Clarence Thomas – The Patron Saint of Judicial Corruption

• Confirmation Lie: "Roe is settled law."
• Reality: Voted to overturn Roe v. Wade in Dobbs v. Jackson (2022).
• Monetized Seat: Took millions in unreported gifts and luxury trips from billionaire Harlan Crow—secret real estate deals. Oligarchs pay Nephew's tuition.
• Fascist Function: Protects billionaire class from taxation, regulation, and prosecution—shields presidential immunity.
• Sources: ProPublica, PaulCraigRoberts.org

"If justice is blind, Thomas sold her cane to the highest bidder."

2. Samuel Alito – The Crusader in Hiding

• Confirmation Lie: "I will respect precedent."


• Reality: Authored the Dobbs decision that reversed 50 years of precedent. Regularly rules for corporate supremacy.


• Monetized Seat: Flew on billionaire Paul Singer's private jet to Alaska; failed to disclose. Later, it ruled in favor of Singer.


• Fascist Function: Undermines federal oversight. Champions deregulation. Expands religious authoritarianism (303 Creative).


• Sources: Reason.com, Intercept

3. Brett Kavanaugh – The Precedent Executioner

• Confirmation Lie: "I love precedent. It's the foundation of our system."


• Reality: Immediately dismantled voting rights (Brnovich v. DNC), reproductive autonomy (Dobbs), and environmental protection.


• Monetized Seat: Federalist Society golden boy. Allegations of undisclosed debts are wiped clean before confirmation.


• Fascist Function: Expands corporate impunity, greenlights executive overreach, assaults civil liberties.


• Sources: MintPress News, CommonDreams.org

"Kavanaugh was not confirmed. He was canonized—by Wall Street and the Heritage Foundation."

4. Amy Coney Barrett – The Handmaid's Signature

• Confirmation Lie: "I hold no animus toward Roe."


• Reality: Cast a decisive vote to overturn it within months.


• Monetized Seat: Accelerated confirmation weeks before the 2020 election. Groomed by far-right judicial pipeline.


• Fascist Function: Legalizes theological rule. Shields corporate polluters. Targets agency authority.


• Sources: National Pulse, The People's Voice

"Barrett isn't just anti-choice—she's anti-agency, anti-worker, anti-reality."

5. Neil Gorsuch – The Corporate Oracle

• Confirmation Lie: "I'll follow the law as written."


• Reality: Sided with Trump in Muslim ban (Trump v. Hawaii), eviscerated agency power in West Virginia v. EPA.


• Monetized Seat: Installed via Senate theft of Merrick Garland's nomination. Ties to secret donor networks exposed.


• Fascist Function: Weakens state power and hands control to fossil giants and tech billionaires.


• Sources: The Intercept, Moon of Alabama

6. John Roberts – The Facade Architect

• Confirmation Lie: "The Court is not political."


• Reality: Authored Shelby County v. Holder (gutted Voting Rights Act), Citizens United (unleashed dark money), defended Dobbs.


• Monetized Seat: Links to corporate legal lobbies. The wife made millions by placing lawyers in firms that argue before the Court.


• Fascist Function: Legitimizes oligarchy behind a smirk and soft tone.


• Sources: Dissident Voice, Slay News

Pattern Summary:

Each of these justices lied to gain power. Then used that power to aid billionaires, shield presidents, erase rights, and mock democracy. Their rulings are not legal interpretations—they are policy decrees drafted by the ruling class, clothed in pseudo-constitutional jargon.

III. The Fascist Pipeline: Bush ➝ Obama ➝ Trump ➝ Endgame

"Fascism, American-style, didn't arrive by coup. It arrived by procedure."

The American fascist project didn't require a dictator. It required two branches in collusion—the Presidency and the Supreme Court—trading legitimacy for obedience, insulation for obedience, and longevity for obedience. The Court legalized the thefts. The White House executed them.

And it all began long before Trump.

► George W. Bush: The Originator

• Judicial Theft: Bush v. Gore (2000)
• The Court stopped the Florida recount, handing Bush the Presidency. No law demanded it. No constitution permitted it. This was judicial fiat for political gain—and the prototype for every subsequent rigged ruling.
• Bribery Legalized: Citizens United v. FEC (2010)
• Though ruled after Bush left, the groundwork was laid under his Court picks (Roberts, Alito). The decision effectively converted political speech into an auction. Corporations became citizens. Actual citizens became spectators.
• Legacy:

• Installed Roberts and Alito—two judicial oligarchs who would later become architects of Dobbs, Shelby, and 303 Creative.

• Expanded executive war powers, invoking emergency law to justify torture, surveillance, and indefinite detention.

• Founded the modern fusion of neocon militarism and judicial authoritarianism.

► Barack Obama: The Silent Accomplice

• The Garland Betrayal (2016):
• Obama allowed Mitch McConnell to blockade Merrick Garland's nomination for 293 days. No court-packing. No executive challenge. He chose "norms" over confrontation—and handed the Court to fascists for a generation.
• Voting Rights Gutted: Shelby County v. Holder (2013)
• The Roberts Court demolished the Voting Rights Act while Obama stood silently. The ruling legalized modern voter suppression.
• Obama offered no legislative response. No mass mobilization. No real opposition.
• Legacy:

• It gave the appearance of liberal governance while preserving every structure of elite rule.

• Ran on "hope" and delivered Harvard boardroom neoliberalism.

• Left Gorsuch's seat vacant for Trump—a generational handoff with a bowtie.

"Obama brought a scalpel to a knife fight. Then, he handed the blade to his enemies."

► Donald Trump: The Fascist Accelerator

• The Trinity of Darkness: Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett
• Three justices were confirmed in one term. All lied under oath. All three "Justices" were installed by the Federalist Society. All have since voted as a bloc to erase the 20th century.
• Key Decisions:

• Dobbs v. Jackson (2022): Abolished federal abortion rights.

• West Virginia v. EPA (2022): Gutted climate regulation.

• 303 Creative (2023): Legalized religious discrimination in commerce.

• Trump v. Anderson (2024): Cleared Trump to run again despite 14th Amendment violations.

• Moore v. Harper (2023): Tried to empower state legislatures to override democratic votes—a judicial blueprint for electoral fascism.

• Trump's Open Fusion of Branches:

• Boasted that the Court would "protect" him from prosecution—and it did.

• Pardoned cronies. Enriched family. Called judges "his."

• Enabled by a Court that rubber-stamped treason in legal Latin.

► Biden: The Enabler-in-Chief

• Refused to Expand the Court
• Despite Dobbs, 303, Shelby, and Moore, Biden left the stolen Court intact. No structural reform. No accountability.
• Preserved institutional decorum while the Constitution burned.
• Legacy:

• Elevated unity over justice.

• Protected institutional legitimacy while that institution legalized autocracy.

• Governed like a placeholder president while Project 2025 built a fascist replacement in plain sight.

The Throughline: Fascist Nuances by Ruling

Case Fascist Function 

Bush v. Gore Judicially installed President

Citizens United Legalized corporate bribery 

Shelby County Opened door to voter suppression 

Dobbs Imposed religious morality, ended bodily autonomy 

303 Creative Legalized ideological discrimination 

West Virginia v. EPA Crippled state regulatory power, empowered corporations 

Moore v. Harper Advanced "independent state legislature theory"—a path to dictatorship by vote 

Trump v. Anderson Gave immunity to insurrectionist candidates. 

IV. The Fusion: POTUS & SCOTUS as One Fascist Machine

"The separation of powers died long ago. What remains is choreography."

The fantasy of co-equal branches, of power in balance and law above politics, is a ghost story of constitutional proportions. It once haunted classrooms and civics textbooks but has long since fled the marble halls of Washington. What we have now is not three branches but two instruments of one will: the Presidency and the Supreme Court fused into a seamless apparatus of elite control.

The President signs, bombs, deregulates, and detains. The Court interprets, absolves, and reframes. They are not checks upon one another—they are partners in an institutional racket carefully designed to preserve the illusion of adversarial governance while consolidating authority in a manner any 20th-century fascist regime would recognize with admiration.

This is not speculative. It is the observable design of modern American rule.

George W. Bush: The Fusion Begins

When the Supreme Court stopped the Florida recount in 2000 to hand Bush the Presidency, it executed a judicial coup with no constitutional basis. The decision in Bush v. Gore wasn't a ruling; it was a coronation. And it signaled the proper role of the Court in the 21st century: not an impartial arbiter of law, but a strategic partner to the executive—a legal concierge for elite continuity.

Bush's Presidency then served as a template for the modern merger of executive violence and judicial protection. A legal memo greenlighted torture. Surveillance metastasized under a doctrine of wartime exceptionality. And every expansion of power was sheathed in the robe of legality. His appointments—Roberts and Alito—were not jurists but ideological fixtures: intelligent, sterile, obedient. Their job was not to interpret the Constitution. It was to restructure it into an instrument of corporate authoritarianism.

The choreography began here: executive action wrapped in legalese, backed by a Court that knew its role was not to resist but to entrench.

Barack Obama: The Enabler

Obama, praised for his calm intellect and careful speech, governed like a systems engineer tasked with safeguarding the empire, not challenging it. He did not contest the Court's hard-right drift; he normalized it. Even as Citizens United legalized bribery, Shelby County destroyed the Voting Rights Act. As the Federalist Society laid judicial siege to the entire regulatory state, Obama played the part of the reasonable centrist. A character in a play he did not write and would not rewrite.

His inaction on court expansion, his acceptance of Mitch McConnell's theft of Merrick Garland's seat, and his refusal to treat judicial sabotage as the constitutional emergency it was—these were not merely missteps. They were compliant. Behind his eloquence and charisma, Obama institutionalized the false civility of procedural surrender. He knew the rules were being broken. He chose to follow them anyway.

Donald Trump: The Merger Made Visible

Where Bush built the machine, and Obama left it running, Trump tore off the veil. He bragged openly that the justices would protect him, and he was right. His Court gave him what he wanted: three Justices in a single term, all preselected by the Federalist Society, all perjurers under oath, all ideological mercenaries who immediately delivered on their unspoken contracts.

He governed not as a president accountable to law but as a CEO wielding a legal team with ultimate veto power over the American people. Dobbs, Trump v. Hawaii, 303 Creative, Moore v. Harper—each decision marked a stage in the descent from constitutional democracy into sanctioned authoritarianism. But none of it was rogue. It was all in sync with the President's demands. The Court operated like a backend server to Trump's executive interface—handling the dirty logic work that translated fascist ambition into enforceable doctrine.

This was not judicial independence. It was judicial loyalty.

Joe Biden: The Manager of Decline

Biden inherited a hijacked Court, a wounded Constitution, and a public demanding action. He offered none. No court expansion. No ethics legislation. There was no mobilization to confront Dobbs, Moore, or the West Virginia v. EPA case. His allegiance, like Obama's, was to institutional normalcy—not to democratic rescue.

And so, the merger continued. Quietly. Passively. Perhaps even more insidiously, because Biden's legitimacy was built on the false promise of reversal. He pledged to undo Trump's damage, then governed as though the damage were irreversible—or not worth addressing.

Where Trump treated the Court as a henchman, Biden treats it as an untouchable priesthood. Both approaches lead to the same place: a Court that rules without resistance and a presidency that never risks confrontation.

This Is Not Government. It Is Consolidation.

What emerges from these four presidencies is not mere dysfunction but a fascist integration —a structural choreography of command and obedience. The President initiates, and the Court affirms. The Court demolishes; the President complies. Each action bolsters the next, with no democratic mediation between them.

Together, they have:

• Replaced voting rights with corporate rights.
• Substituted theology for public policy.
• Legalized corruption under the guise of "speech."
• Shielded war criminals while prosecuting whistleblowers.
• Crushed bodily autonomy, labor power, and environmental regulation.
• Empowered state legislatures to override elections.

This isn't a glitch in the system. It is the system—optimized, lubricated, and lethal.

The illusion of rivalry between SCOTUS and POTUS persists only in editorial cartoons and op-eds written by those who confuse posture for power. In reality, the Court and the Presidency are twin engines of the same machine: one writes the script, and the other delivers the line. One wears a robe; the other, a flag pin.

Together, they have brought us to the edge of governance by decree, where law is a disguise, and justice is outsourced to wealth and theology.

V. The Dynasty Scam: Monetizing the Bench, Selling the Throne

"Power is a commodity. And in America's ruling class, it is bought, sold, and leveraged like any other asset."

The Supreme Court and the Presidency are less about public service and more about franchises of wealth and influence. The justices don't merely interpret the law—they cash in on their seats. The presidents don't merely govern—they monetize their office, converting political capital into private fortunes. This is no anomaly. It's a business model.

Supreme Court: The Billionaire-Backed Franchise

Take Clarence Thomas, whose opulent vacations on luxury yachts gifted by billionaires became a scandalous open secret. Thomas's refusal to recuse himself from cases involving those benefactors reveals a corrupt ecosystem where justice bends under the weight of elite largesse.

Samuel Alito, too, navigates the murky waters of political dark money, a beneficiary and enabler of a shadowy network that funds not only campaigns but entire ideological movements. The Citizens United decision, authored by the Court under Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito, unlocked an avalanche of untraceable spending—a legal license for oligarchs to buy democracy.

Kavanaugh and Barrett, products of the Federalist Society pipeline, owe their seats to dark-money groups, such as the Heritage Foundation and Koch-funded think tanks. Their rulings reflect not legal impartiality but the priorities of their financiers—corporate profits, deregulation, and the rollback of worker protections.

Roberts, ostensibly the "moderate," is anything but. His hand guided Citizens United, Shelby County, and Dobbs—all victories for the oligarchy's agenda. The Chief Justice sits atop a gilded throne, not as an arbiter, but as a gatekeeper of elite privilege.

Presidents: The Throne as a Cash Cow

The Presidency has become the ultimate launchpad for wealth extraction.

Donald Trump, with his complex business empire, turned the White House into a revolving door of influence peddling. Pardons were commodities. Foreign cash flowed into his hotels. Campaign rallies doubled as profit centers. The Presidency was less a public trust than a corporate takeover.

Barack Obama and George W. Bush are not innocent bystanders. Post-presidency, both parlayed their offices into multimillion-dollar speaking fees, book deals, and private equity roles—becoming part of the revolving oligarchic class they once governed. The Presidency was a steppingstone, not a service.

Joe Biden's family connections, decades-long political career, and ties to corporate interests form a complex web that blurs the lines between public service and private gain. The political dynasty is less about ideology than the perpetuation of access and wealth.

The Oligarchic Cycle

This intertwining of judicial and executive wealth consolidates power beyond democratic control. The justices cash in on their seats; the presidents cash in on their terms. The system prioritizes loyalty to elite interests over fidelity to the law or the people.

The Supreme Court is a lucrative franchise, a position that confers not just lifetime power but lifetime profit. Book deals, speaking engagements, consulting gigs, and secretive retreats funded by billionaires ensure that justices remain firmly tethered to the oligarchic class.

The Presidency is a revolving door where the state's power lubricates private enrichment, creating a political class indistinguishable from the plutocracy it supposedly regulates.

Conclusion: A State for Sale

The American government today is less a democracy and more a profit-driven enterprise, a marketplace of influence where the highest bidders secure not just policy but justice itself.

This dynasty scam — the Court's wealth-backed rulings and the Presidency's monetized power — is the final expression of fascism's evolution in the United States: a state whose primary function is to protect and enrich the ruling class.

"Until the franchise is broken, the American people will remain subjects of a regime masquerading as a republic."

"We the People" and "Of the People, By the People, and For the People" have been bastardized to "Us and Them," with "Us" being the Oligarchs and "Them" being everyone else. This Fascist juxtaposition of legalese rhetoric is a test run, a prototyping of Unconstitutional Fascist Dictatorship.

VI. The Endgame: American Fascism in Plain Sight

"Fascism no longer lurks in shadows—it marches openly in the corridors of power."

The machinery built by Bush, accelerated by Trump, normalized by Obama, and managed by Biden is not an aberration. It is the current operating system of the United States government. The Supreme Court and the Presidency no longer function as independent powers but as the central nodes of an authoritarian network designed to dismantle democracy from within.

The 2024 election is not just a contest of personalities but a battlefield where the Court will act as judge, jury, and executioner of constitutional norms. It will shield Trump from prosecution, legitimizing electoral theft with legal fiat. It will give its blessing to Project 2025—the Heritage Foundation's blueprint for purging the civil service, weaponizing the federal bureaucracy, and installing ideological loyalists in every branch of government.

What lies ahead is not conservative governance. It is authoritarian rule dressed in conservative camouflage—a dictatorship masquerading as democracy.

The Court as Authoritarian Architect

The justices have codified corporate feudalism, Christian nationalism, and election sabotage into law. The Court's rulings dismantle voting rights, erase bodily autonomy, and destroy environmental protections, all while cementing billionaire influence as the core principle of governance.

No longer merely interpreting the Constitution, the Court reinterprets reality itself—making fascism legal, making dissent criminal, making democracy a hollow shell.

The Presidency as Enforcer

The Presidency enforces this judicial agenda with impunity. Surveillance, militarized policing, executive decrees—all tools wielded against a disempowered populace. The President's oath to "preserve, protect, and defend" has been hollowed out, replaced by an oath to protect oligarchy and repress resistance.

The fusion of Court and executive power means that legal resistance inside the system is futile. The real power lies beyond the ballot box in a shadow network of billionaire-backed ideologues, ideological think tanks, and political operatives who orchestrate and profit from the decay.

The Stakes Are Existential

SCOTUS/POTUS Fascism is not a political disagreement. It is a civilizational crossroads. The survival of democratic principles—free speech, equal rights, accountable governance—depends on exposing this fascist merger for what it is.

But exposing alone is insufficient. The people must understand the structure of this authoritarianism—the systemic confluence of money, law, and violence that underpins it.

"Until the myth of separation of powers is shattered until the Court's legitimacy is revoked until the presidency is no longer a tool of oligarchs, America's democracy is a tomb waiting to be sealed."

The Supreme Court is not a neutral referee. The Presidency is not a protector of democracy. Together, they have built a fascist machine, slick and silent, ready to crush dissent and enshrine dictatorship in the guise of order.

The question now is not if it will be stopped, but how—and who will stop it.

VII. The Supreme Court, the Presidency, and the Entrenchment of Fascism: An Authoritarian Axis

In the steadily darkening American political landscape, the intertwined roles of the Supreme Court and the Presidency form an authoritarian axis that has accelerated the normalization of fascistic governance. This axis, as analyzed across independent and critical news sources—such as The People's Voice, Moon Over Alabama, and The Grayzone—has become the fulcrum upon which the erosion of democratic institutions pivots.

The Supreme Court, once a bulwark of constitutional balance, has increasingly acted as an enabler rather than a check on executive overreach. Through a series of rulings that amplify presidential power while undermining legislative and civil rights protections, the Court has cleared the path for unchecked executive authority. This judicial complicity is not accidental; it reflects a broader ideological capture by conservative and corporatist interests, as outlined by Scheer Post and Strategic Culture Foundation commentators, who document the Court's role in dismantling voting rights, weakening federal oversight, and legitimizing expansive surveillance programs.

Concurrently, the Presidency—regardless of the occupant—has exploited this judicial permissiveness to expand its unilateral power under the guise of national security and crisis management. From Truthout's incisive investigations into the Biden administration's continuation of surveillance state policies to Moon Over Alabama's critiques of Trump's blatant assaults on democratic norms, a pattern emerges: the executive branch uses the judiciary's acquiescence as cover for systemic authoritarian consolidation. These dynamics manifest in efforts to criminalize dissent, curtail free speech, and weaponize federal agencies against political opponents.

This symbiotic relationship between judiciary and executive power reflects what Global Research terms a "slow-motion coup," wherein legalism masks the de facto erosion of constitutional governance. The Supreme Court's recent decisions effectively sanitize the executive's increasingly fascist tendencies, signaling a judicial abdication that legitimizes the hollowing out of democratic safeguards. This process has transformed the Presidency from a constitutionally constrained office into an instrument of authoritarian rule, wielding administrative decrees and emergency powers with minimal oversight.

The geopolitical dimension cannot be ignored. Independent sources such as Sputnik News and The Duran highlight how this internal American descent into authoritarianism resonates globally, emboldening far-right regimes and undermining liberal democratic alliances. The judiciary-executive nexus in the U.S. sets a dangerous precedent, illustrating how ostensibly democratic structures can be hollowed from within by those who subvert them under the pretense of legalism and order.

In sum, the current American condition is defined by a judicial-executive convergence that undergirds creeping fascism facilitated by courts that provide cover for executive excesses and presidents who exploit this cover to centralize power and suppress opposition. As The Vineyard of the Saker poignantly warns, without a decisive rupture in this authoritarian alliance, the United States risks irrevocably losing its democratic character, succumbing instead to a legalized autocracy clothed in the trappings of constitutional formality.

The Supreme Court of the United States and the Presidency are now acting as Mafia Kapos, offering us "their protection."

Bibliography

• 2021 Clarence Thomas Financial Disclosure
• 2023 Clarence Thomas Financial Disclosure
• 2023 DOJ Letter on Thomas Gifts
• 2024 Campaign Legal Center Complaint
• 2023 Timeline of Gifts to Thomas
• 2022 “Captured Courts” Senate Report
• 2024 House Hearing on Leonard Leo
• Senate QFRs: Leo, Kavanaugh coordination

Independent Investigative & Political Analysis

• The People's Voice
• https://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/index.php
• A platform providing unfiltered news and analysis on national and international affairs, with critical coverage of government overreach and judicial activism supporting authoritarian trends.
• Moon Over Alabama
• https://www.moonofalabama.org/
• Insightful geopolitical and domestic political commentary emphasizing the erosion of democratic norms and judicial complicity in the rise of executive authoritarianism.
• The Grayzone
• https://thegrayzone.com/
• Critical analyses of geopolitics, U.S. domestic policy, and global power dynamics expose the convergence of corporate, judicial, and executive powers that facilitate authoritarian consolidation.
• Scheer Post
• https://scheerpost.com/
• Investigative reporting and analysis focused on exposing the intertwined nature of political power and the judiciary's role in enabling executive abuses.
• Truthout
• https://truthout.org/
• A social justice-oriented investigative platform documenting the expansion of surveillance and repression under both Republican and Democratic administrations.
• Common Dreams
• https://www.commondreams.org/
• Progressive news outlets with critical reporting on judicial decisions that undermine voting rights and civil liberties, framing these as components of rising authoritarianism.
• MintPress News
• https://www.mintpressnews.com/
• Investigative journalism challenges official narratives, including how judicial rulings have shifted the balance of power toward the executive branch.
• Global Research
• https://globalresearch.ca/
• Alternative international news source analyzing U.S. political shifts, particularly how the judiciary and Presidency align to erode democratic checks and balances.
• The Vineyard of the Saker
• https://thesaker.is/
• Independent geopolitical commentary highlighting the threat posed by the U.S. judicial-executive nexus to democratic governance worldwide.

Geopolitical and International Context

• Sputnik News
• https://sputniknews.com/
• Russian-based international news agency offering coverage on U.S. internal political dynamics, noting the impact of American authoritarian trends on global stability.
• The Duran
• https://theduran.com/
• Provides geopolitical analysis focusing on U.S. politics and how judicial decisions and executive actions contribute to global shifts in power.
• Strategic Culture Foundation
• https://strategic-culture.org/
• Analyzes international relations and critiques Western democratic backsliding, emphasizing the judiciary's role in reinforcing executive authoritarianism.
• Gatestone Institute
• https://gatestoneinstitute.org/
• Although generally conservative, it provides an analysis of security and governance issues related to the expansion of executive power.

Alternative & Critical News Aggregators

• Alternet
• https://www.alternet.org/
• Provides progressive insights into politics and culture, with articles critiquing Supreme Court rulings that bolster presidential overreach.
• OffGuardian
• https://off-guardian.org/
• Critical of mainstream media narratives, it often highlights judicial and executive actions that threaten civil liberties.
• The Last American Vagabond
• https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/
• Independent journalism covering political repression, judicial complicity, and the authoritarian trajectory of U.S. governance.
• Zero Hedge
• https://www.zerohedge.com/
• Known for its financial and political analysis, the publication documents how institutional shifts, including judicial decisions, favor authoritarian policies.

Additional Resources

• Al Jazeera English
• https://www.aljazeera.com
• In-depth global reporting, including U.S. political and judicial developments with a focus on democratic erosion.

Brennan Center for Justice. (2021). Judicial recusal and the appearance of bias. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/judicial-recusal-and-appearance-bias

Cohen, A. (2020). Supreme inequality: The Supreme Court’s fifty-year battle for a more unjust America. Penguin Press.

Fix the Court. (2023). Supreme Court financial disclosures database. https://www.fixthecourt.com/disclosures/

Gross, B. (1980). Friendly fascism: The new face of power in America. M. Evans & Company. https://archive.org/details/friendlyfascism00bert

New York Times. (2019, August 1). How the Federalist Society won. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/01/us/politics/federalist-society.html

ProPublica. (2023). Clarence Thomas and the billionaire. https://www.propublica.org/series/supreme-court-scotus-ethics-clarence-thomas

Public Citizen. (2023). Captured courts: The corporate takeover of the judiciary. https://www.citizen.org/article/captured-courts-report/

SCOTUSblog. (2023, October). A chef in the Chevron’s kitchen: How agencies lost their bite. https://www.scotusblog.com/2023/10/a-chef-in-the-chevrons-kitchen-how-agencies-lost-their-bite/

Supreme Court of the United States. (2010). Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-205.pdf

Supreme Court of the United States. (2000). Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98. https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-949.ZPC.html

Wolin, S. (2008). Democracy Incorporated: Managed democracy and the specter of inverted totalitarianism. Princeton University Press. https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691135663/democracy-incorporated

American Bar Association. (2023, May). ABA urges binding code of conduct for Supreme Court justices. https://www.americanbar.org/news/abanews/aba-news-archives/2023/05/aba-urges-supreme-court-code/

Ben-Ghiat, R. (2020). Strongmen: Mussolini to the present. W.W. Norton & Company. https://wwnorton.com/books/Strongmen

The Billionaire Bench & Presidential Syndicate: SCOTUS + POTUS as America's Fascist Cartel

###

© Tracy Turner