Ned Lud

Spoiler alert: Not Muslim. Not affiliated with Hamas. And definitely not an Islamophobe. Like Zuckerberg. 

This information is backed by reports from organizations such as Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and The Electronic Frontier Foundation.

Imagine a world where information can be freely accessed by anyone due to the advancements in digitalization, however, we currently live in a reality where the web feels more like a dystopian maze filled with propaganda: a world built around concealing the truth and silencing voices of opposition. This is not simply a disagreement of beliefs, but a fundamental redefining of communication as we know it-social media and search engines have been weaponized for control.

This can best be observed in the suffocation of the Palestinian story. Amid rising conflict within the Middle Eastern countries, a powerful let-it-be censorship appears to silence anyone who dares to go against the widely accepted geopolitical narrative. This is not limited to authoritarian countries; so-called liberal marketplace technology corporations entangled with the National Endowment for Democracy (NED, no pun intended) and international nonprofits censor information, be it intentionally or carelessly, becoming the gatekeepers of ‘free speech’.

While the rhetoric of human rights and freedom persists on the surface, these digital platforms wield a much darker power. By cloaking critical discourse in algorithmic biases and regulatory loopholes, they make it harder for Palestinian voices to be heard, even as the physical world silences them through siege and oppression. The surface web, once heralded as a platform for diverse voices, has become a battleground for digital imperialism, a space where narratives are not simply challenged-they are erased.

The Algorithmic Gatekeepers: Meta, the NED, and the Political Economy of Censorship

Meta, which has dominion over Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram, is responsible for over-silencing billions of voices using delicate algorithms. In almost every aspect of life, Meta reigns supreme with boons and banes in paradigmatic control. Over the years, this corporation has become a global enforcer who polices content at Meta and Facebook and ascertains what people are shown. Neither is opacity a virtue Meta claims to embrace. Grenades are thrown on the idea of openness with voices oaring towards geo-political ideals silenced one way or another. It’s no surprise that Meta silences voices that actually accentuate opposing narratives, thus emphasizing the ongoing-and very real-problems of Microsoft.

This is Your Brain: This is Your Brain on Facebook.

Your brain is your most important organ. Most of the others can be replaced—but not your brain. You are damaging it. The other organs are slaves to the brain. When Facebook damages your brain, your other organs will start failing too.

The intersection of social media use, dopamine-dependent behaviors, and cognitive health—particularly aging and Alzheimer's disease—has garnered frantic attention from mental health professionals and neuroscientists. Experts below discuss how platforms like Facebook affect brain function and aging:

Dopamine, Social Media, and Compulsive Scrolling

Social media platforms exploit our brain reward system, says Stanford University psychiatry professor Dr. Anna Lembke:

"We are wired to want to connect with other human beings," she explained. When we join in the outrage, happiness or grief of an intimate post, our brain's reward system gives us a dose of dopamine. (ktvz.com)

Dr. Mark D. Griffiths, Distinguished Professor of Behavioural Addiction at Nottingham Trent University, notes:
"Social networking sites are 'chock-ablock' with intermittent rewards. Social network site regulars never know whether their next message or warning is the one that will make them feel really good... Intermittent rewards cause people to respond for longer."

(hackernoon.com, medium.com)

These unexpected rewards, or "variable reinforcement schedules," trigger dopamine release, reinforcing behavior and increasing compulsive use. (steverosephd.com)

Aging, Attention, and Cognitive Overload

Dr. Richard Isaacson, Alzheimer’s prevention neurologist, discusses the impact of our hyper-digital lives:

"We're in a different world today... with the stimulation coming in on every side. I just don't believe the brain has really been accustomed to those technological developments." (drphilstieg.com)

He explains that this perpetual stream of stimuli disrupts attention, which is essential for memory formation.

The Role of Dopamine in Alzheimer's Disease

A systematic review and network meta-analysis on PubMed found that Alzheimer's patients have significantly lower levels of dopamine and its receptors than healthy individuals:

"In general, decreased levels of dopaminergic neurotransmitters were related to the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease." (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)

Disruptions in dopamine signaling may contribute to the development or progression of Alzheimer’s.

The Effects of Social Media on Mental Well-being

Clinical psychologist Dr. Emma Hepburn warns against the emotional toll of passive social media use:
"Low mood happens when you're a passive user... Our brain is comparative by nature, but not with so much data."

When we're sleep-deprived, stressed, or overwhelmed, this cognitive strain can drive us deeper into the social media trap. (telegraph.co.uk)

Passive scrolling and constant comparison can lead to lowered self-esteem and worsened mental health.

Experts agree: Platforms like Facebook capitalize on dopamine loops in the brain, promoting compulsive use and cognitive overload. For older adults, this can disrupt memory and mimic patterns linked to Alzheimer’s disease. Avoiding these risks begins with mindful, limited engagement.

Voices critiquing Israel covering Gaza’s war are suppressed to a point of non-existence, routinely flagged, removed, and buried by layers of automated decisions and vague content guidelines. This is not simply an issue of some random glitches in content moderation of off-shored moderation centers tending to hound technical loopholes ensnared in the content policy removal portal-Meta holds collective discourse hostage-an attempt to block the public from seeing competing narratives. Keeping the stout unscathed becomes a primary motive, reasoning thrusting geopolitics and silence shrouded in a systematic paradigm framework silencing critiques-proving to be detrimental that the dominant paradigm keeps suffocating voices while decision after decision enable authorities to flourish endlessly unchallenged.

The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) - a U.S. government-funded organization known for its influence over global media and policy - has had a hand in shaping this digital landscape, often pushing for the suppression of any discourse that could undermine Western hegemony.

In theory, these platforms are designed to be free, decentralized spaces where voices from all corners of the globe can be heard. In practice, however, they have become extensions of statecraft, finely tuned to reflect and protect the interests of their largest stakeholders. The same algorithms that promote “engagement” through sensationalism also suppress nuanced, critical perspectives - often through methods as subtle as reducing the reach of a post or applying shadowbans, where posts disappear from the broader public eye without notifying the user. This is the invisible censorship: digital repression without accountability.

NGOs, Soft Power, and the Illusion of Neutrality

While Meta and other tech giants take the brunt of criticism for their role in censorship, a more insidious form of suppression operates through the intertwined network of international NGOs and Western-backed organizations. These entities, often framed as neutral arbiters of human rights, inadvertently - or perhaps purposefully - lend their resources to the erasure of Palestinian voices under the guise of promoting “peace” or “dialogue.”

The NED has long been criticized for its dual role: promoting democracy in the form of controlled dissent and facilitating global narratives that align with the interests of U.S. foreign policy. It is a subtle operation-one that is, on the surface, seemingly benevolent. Yet, when these organizations work in tandem with platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter, they create an ecosystem where narratives are not only suppressed but re-written to fit geopolitical agendas.

These NGOs act as amplifiers of the very narratives that help maintain the status quo, and their alignment with Western powers ensures that any form of resistance, particularly that which challenges U.S. and Israeli policies, is either overlooked or systematically silenced. This is not just censorship-it is collaboration with global hegemony, one that suppresses the truth while framing itself as a force for good.

Yet, even within this landscape of digital control and international complicity, there remains a growing resistance: the dark web.

Dark Web Resistance: A Realm of Free Speech Amidst Digital Suppression

Meta the corporation is genocidal in intent. Just quit. Some of us changed the password to 42 characters without writing it down and then inactivated. Won’t you do the same? Or is a hit of dopamine addiction daily more important?

As mainstream platforms tighten their grip, a counter-narrative is emerging in the shadows of the internet: the dark web. In stark contrast to the surface web, where censorship is engineered through algorithms and government-backed influence, the dark web offers a semblance of autonomy, albeit at great risk. Here, Palestinian activists, journalists, and digital dissidents continue to speak freely-without the looming threat of shadowbanning or surveillance.

The dark web, often characterized by its anonymity and decentralized nature, has become a haven for those whose voices are forcibly removed from mainstream platforms. Though access is more challenging, it offers the opportunity for information to flow outside the reach of both corporate and state surveillance. This “underground” space has allowed Palestinians to document and share real-time footage of events in Gaza, West Bank, and beyond, circumventing traditional media filters.

While the dark web may not be a solution to the broader issue of digital erasure, it represents a defiant stand against the empire’s control of information. Here, in the shadows, Palestinian voices continue to resist-unfiltered, unmoderated, and unapologetic.

Meta’s Digital Imperialism: The Weaponization of Silence

In the digital age, Meta - with its monopolistic grip on social media - has evolved into one of the most insidious agents of geopolitical influence. Despite presenting itself as a platform for open expression, Meta has effectively become a digital imperialist: an empire of data, where the rules are defined not by the public good, but by the interests of the most powerful corporate and political actors.

What Meta has achieved is not merely a platform for social interaction; it is a battleground for the global narrative. And on this battlefield, Palestinian voices have been systematically sidelined, suppressed, or outright erased. Meta’s censorship operations, which claim to be based on neutrality, are anything but. Beneath the facade of “community standards” and “content moderation,” a far darker truth emerges: the algorithmic machinery of Meta is engineered not to facilitate free speech, but to ensure the protection of power structures-namely, those aligned with U.S. and Israeli geopolitical interests.

The corporate decisions made behind closed doors at Meta are not accidental. In fact, these are the calculated outcomes of a system designed to amplify dominant narratives while silencing the marginalized. Meta’s censorship system is a well-oiled machine, tuned not for fairness or transparency, but for safeguarding the global status quo.

Meta's algorithms-designed under the guise of neutral content moderation-act as gatekeepers of what can be said. They use a sophisticated system of flagging, blocking, and reducing the reach of content that challenges these prevailing narratives. Palestinian content critical of Israeli actions, often documented and shared by on-the-ground witnesses, faces immediate shadowbanning or removal. Posts are buried, articles are discredited, and voices are drowned out by the relentless weight of algorithmic bias, all in the name of maintaining a “peaceful” online environment.

This isn’t a case of isolated errors. It’s part of a pattern, a deeply embedded system of digital repression where the voices of Palestinians - those directly impacted by the conflict - are drowned in a sea of corporate-controlled narratives. The reality is, Meta's content policies, often cloaked in the language of "neutrality," function as tools of suppression, keeping the status quo intact and curbing any meaningful opposition.

Moreover, Meta's collaboration with governments around the world - particularly the U.S. and Israel - raises critical questions about the role of big tech in contemporary geopolitics. When governments lean on these tech giants to silence voices they deem “threatening” or “inconvenient,” the platforms are no longer neutral. They become active participants in shaping global power dynamics. Meta, in its complicity with state actors, has become a digital arm of imperialism.

The real tragedy here is that it’s not just a matter of removing "controversial" posts or blocking a few users. Meta’s system creates an ecosystem of erasure, where Palestinian voices are not simply silenced for a moment-they are hidden from the world. What Meta has perfected is the art of digital invisibility, of ensuring that certain narratives never even reach the public eye. The result is a disinformation empire, one where censorship is not an anomaly but an expected feature.

What’s perhaps most chilling is the sheer scale of Meta’s reach. With over 3 billion users across Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, the company is the world’s largest social media empire. This means Meta controls not only the flow of information but the perception of global events. When Palestinian voices are erased from the discussion, they are effectively erased from history. The ability to shape reality is now in the hands of a private corporation whose primary concern is profit-not justice, not truth, not human rights.

Meta’s monopoly over the flow of information gives it an unprecedented power to reshape the contours of global discourse. In this context, censorship isn’t just an act of digital control - it’s an act of historical erasure. By actively silencing Palestinian narratives, Meta ensures that the broader public will remain ignorant, disinterested, or indifferent to the ongoing suffering and struggle of Palestinians.

The Facade of Free Speech: Meta's Manipulation of Public Perception

Meta’s role in this digital empire is often disguised under the rhetoric of “free speech” and “democratization of information.” Yet, in reality, these ideals are cynically manipulated. Meta’s commitment to free expression is far less about facilitating open discourse and more about maintaining control over the very mechanisms of communication.

The company’s public stance is often contradictory to its actions. On the one hand, Meta presents itself as an advocate for free speech, promoting open dialogue and the free exchange of ideas. On the other hand, its content moderation policies actively suppress the very conversations that challenge state-sponsored narratives. This hypocrisy reveals a deeply ingrained corporate interest in preserving the power of the political and economic elites.

The truth is that Meta's policies are not about neutrality-they are about control. When a government or political actor pressures Meta to remove or suppress content, it’s not just about following laws or regulations. It’s about maintaining relationships with those in power. Meta’s decision to enforce content moderation selectively - often targeting Palestinian voices and narratives - is part of a larger geopolitical strategy that prioritizes the interests of powerful state actors over the principles of free speech and open dialogue.

Meta’s Censorship Machine: A Global Network of Influence

What makes Meta’s role in this censorship campaign particularly alarming is the global network it has created, one that extends far beyond the borders of the United States or Israel. The company has created a system where censorship operates across national lines, with tech giants like Meta partnering with governments and international organizations to control the flow of information. This is digital colonialism at its most sophisticated.

Meta’s partnership with the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and similar entities illustrates how the boundaries between tech corporations, state power, and international diplomacy have blurred. By collaborating with international actors, Meta plays an integral part in the digitalization of global imperialism. The impact is not confined to any one region or conflict; it is a blueprint for how digital imperialism can extend far beyond military occupations or economic sanctions, infiltrating the very fabric of information itself.

The Digital Resistance: Escaping Meta’s Web of Control

While Meta and its corporate allies create a suffocating atmosphere of digital oppression, an equally determined resistance is rising from the depths of the internet, fueled by autonomous voices, independent journalists, and activists who refuse to be silenced. This resistance isn’t relegated to the fringes or the far-right; it’s driven by a moral imperative to fight back against the digital erasure of Palestinian narratives and to reclaim the public square from the imperial grip of monopolistic tech giants.

The Rise of Alternative Platforms

As Meta and other Silicon Valley giants systematically erase dissent, the search for alternative platforms that champion freedom of expression has become more urgent. These platforms-untethered from the political and corporate interests that dominate the surface web-offer the last refuge for those silenced by the mainstream. Federated social networks, such as Mastodon, Diaspora, and Peertube, present a decentralized model of communication, one that is more resilient to censorship.

These platforms are built on the principle that power shouldn’t be concentrated in the hands of a few corporations but rather spread across a global community of users. They stand as a direct challenge to Facebook’s monopoly on public discourse, offering spaces where Palestinian voices and other marginalized groups can share their narratives free from corporate interference.

Mastodon

Mastodon, a decentralized alternative to Twitter, is quickly becoming a haven for those disillusioned with the corporate censorship of platforms like Twitter and Facebook. With its federated structure, no single entity controls the flow of information, and users can join or create communities based on shared values. The platform offers an important alternative for activists, journalists, and communities like Palestinians who need spaces of free expression without corporate interference.

Visit Mastodon

Diaspora

Diaspora is a distributed social network that allows users to retain full control over their data. It operates without the central authority of companies like Meta, making it an ideal platform for resistant voices who are often targeted by algorithmic censorship. Through its "pods" (independent servers), users can create their own communities that prioritize privacy and free speech.

Explore Diaspora

Peertube

As a decentralized video-sharing platform, Peertube is an alternative to YouTube, offering a space for independent creators and journalists. It allows for free expression without the threat of content takedowns or algorithmic suppression, making it a vital space for resistance movements to broadcast uncensored media, including real-time reports from Palestinian activists on the ground.

Discover Peertube

The Dark Web: Unfiltered, Uncensored, and Unapologetic

As mainstream platforms align themselves with state interests, the dark web has emerged as a critical space for those committed to truth and resistance. Here, digital dissidents can communicate freely without the risk of surveillance or censorship from the corporate behemoths that dominate the surface web.

The dark web’s promise is rooted in its anonymity, decentralization, and freedom from governmental oversight. Tor, the most well-known tool for accessing the dark web, allows users to access sites that are deliberately hidden from the public eye - a powerful tool for activists and journalists who need to bypass both corporate censorship and state surveillance.

It is on the dark web that Palestinian voices find the space to organize, share information, and broadcast stories that mainstream media would prefer to ignore. Whether through encrypted messaging platforms or anonymous publishing sites, the dark web serves as a sanctuary where the Palestinian struggle can be documented, discussed, and disseminated in a way that mainstream platforms would never allow. This digital refuge is a testament to the resilience of resistance in the face of global suppression.

Tor Network

The Tor Network is a free, open-source software that enables anonymous communication by directing internet traffic through a free, worldwide, volunteer overlay network. It allows activists to access uncensored websites and communicate without fear of surveillance. For Palestinians and others targeted by digital censorship, Tor is an essential tool for maintaining an open exchange of information.

Access Tor

SecureDrop

For whistleblowers and journalists committed to truth, SecureDrop offers a secure, encrypted way to submit documents and communicate with media outlets without revealing their identities. Media outlets like The Intercept and others use SecureDrop to receive sensitive information from sources who cannot afford to be exposed. For Palestinians facing surveillance, SecureDrop presents a vital mechanism to leak information in the fight for truth.

Learn About SecureDrop

Freedom of Speech Platforms

Platforms like Solid and Scuttlebutt take decentralization even further, empowering users to control their data without interference from state or corporate actors. These platforms offer communities that are free from the oversight of organizations like Meta, creating unmoderated spaces where users can communicate freely and without the fear of censorship. They act as powerful antidotes to the centralized, corporate-controlled platforms that suppress marginalized voices.
Visit Solid

Discover Scuttlebutt

The Unwavering Spirit of Internet Resistance

The truth is, Meta and its corporate allies may control the surface web, but the digital intifada is far from defeated. Whether it is through decentralized networks like Mastodon, Diaspora, and Peertube or through the anonymous networks of the dark web, the battle for Palestinian voices is far from over.

It is in these alternative spaces that the Palestinian resistance continues to have a voice. These alternatives are more than just alternatives to corporate-controlled social media-they are spaces of resistance, spaces of truth, and spaces of justice. And even though Meta's algorithms and the global surveillance networks continue to target and suppress these voices, the digital intifada will find ways to continue, to evolve, and to resist.

In this battle for the right to free speak, the resistance is not just in the words; it’s in the infrastructure-the decentralized, uncensored networks that refuse to be silenced.

Banana Clip: Eleven Ways to Legally Cripple Meta’$ Market Empire

In an era when public dissent is throttled by algorithmic silencers and the digital commons is patrolled by corporate thought police, resistance demands both strategy and moral precision. Meta-Facebook by any other name-has metastasized into a surveillance panopticon draped in pastel UX and weaponized civility. But this Goliath, like all empires, has soft underbellies. Here’s how to strike-legally, ethically, and publicly.

1. Withdraw the Golden Stream: Cancel Ad Buys

Meta’s revenue is an IV drip of ad dollars. Remove the needle. If thousands of small businesses and independent brands cancel their ad spending, Meta bleeds. Mass advertising boycotts aren’t symbolic-they hit balance sheets. Think Montgomery Bus Boycott, but for ad pixels.

2. Flee the Plantation: Support Alt-Tech

Exit the walled gardens of surveillance capitalism. Mastodon, Diaspora, and PeerTube aren’t perfect-but they’re not owned by behavioral economists engineering dopamine dependency. User flight dents the precious “engagement metrics” Meta flaunts to investors.

3. Name the Censor: Public Pressure Campaigns

Grassroots advocacy still works-if loud, relentless, and unignorable. Hashtags, petitions, viral campaigns, and direct calls for boycotts can shame, disrupt, and destabilize corporate reputations. Meta may own the mirror, but it still fears the reflection.

4. Boardroom Insurgency: Shareholder Rebellion

Own one share? You own a voice. Show up at meetings. Demand accountability. Leverage proxy votes. Shareholder activism has upended oil giants and gunmakers. Tech is not immune.

5. Expose, Don’t Invent: Ethical Disinformation

Not lies-illumination. Publish what’s hidden: studies, leaks, internal documents, FOIA revelations. Truth is Meta’s kryptonite when that truth undermines public trust.

6. Partner with the Press: Negative Narrative Engineering

Work with journalists. Feed whistleblower stories to reputable outlets. Help frame the narrative. Brands are not built on code-they’re built on myth. Undermine the myth.

7. Internationalize the Fight: Global Activist Alliances

Coordinate with digital rights defenders worldwide. When Meta violates Palestinian expression, Brazilian land rights, or Indian farmer protests, make it a global outrage. Regulation follows reputation.

8. Advocate for Shackles: Push Legal Regulations

Lobby for real teeth in Big Tech oversight. Break monopolies. Demand anti-censorship and privacy laws. Meta’s stock price isn’t immune to subpoenas and Senate hearings.

9. Starve the Beast: Boycott the Platforms

Log off. Delete. Disengage. If engagement metrics tank, so does ad revenue. Encourage others to do the same. Every user is a data point-and a vote.

10. Litigate: Support Class-Action Lawsuits

When Meta silences voices en masse, it invites legal redress. Class-action lawsuits can expose internal rot and trigger fines that make investors sweat.

11. Incite the Righteous: Employee Rebellion

Internal dissent is viral. Support whistleblowers. Encourage employees to leak, protest, and resist. Nothing unnerves a trillion-dollar firm like insubordination from within.

Exhibit A: Documented Acts of Censorship

This is Your Brain:
This is Your Brain on Facebook:

Your brain is your most important organ. Most of the others can be replaced, but not your brain. You are damaging it. The other organs are slaves to the brain. When Facebook damages your brain, your other organs will start failing, too.

The intersection of social media use, dopamine-dependent behaviors, and cognitive health—particularly aging and Alzheimer's disease—

1. Idle scrolling triggers dopamine surges that mimic addictive patterns seen in substance abuse.
2. Overstimulation dulls executive function and reduces working memory capacity over time.
3. Long-term social media engagement correlates with increased cognitive decline in aging populations.
4. Preliminary studies suggest links between excessive platform use and elevated Alzheimer’s risk markers.

This isn’t just about Meta. It’s about memory, resistance, and reclaiming the public square. Silence, like capital, compounds. And in this moment, refusal to resist is complicity in erasure. The legal tools are there. The moral case is undeniable.

Don’t beg for a voice-wield it.

These politicians and their switchboards are public domain. Remind them that they serve us, we don’t serve them. Ask them to splinter Meta into millions of little pieces that cannot work together, anymore.

Congressional Oversight of Telecoms

Sources

• Baroud, R. (2025, April 15). *When censorship kills: Social media and the war on the Palestinian narrative*. Palestine Chronicle
• Human Rights Watch. (2023, December 20). *Meta: Systemic censorship of Palestine content*
• Mahdawi, A. (2025, May 28). *Have you looked at satellite images of Gaza? You should*. The Guardian
• Pejcha, C. S. (2023, October 19). *How shadowbanning silences pro-Palestine voices*. Document Journal
• The Guardian. (2025, June 4). *UN denounces Israel's 'deliberate choices' depriving Palestinians of essentials – as it happened*
• The Guardian. (2025, June 3). *Masked Israeli troops block media visit to West Bank site of Oscar-winning film*
• Times of Israel. (2025, June 4). *Over 80% of Palestinian reporters self-censor, study finds*
• Al Jazeera. (2023, October 24). *Are social media giants censoring pro-Palestine voices amid Israel’s war?*
• Middle East Eye. (2024, August 20). *War on Gaza: Palestinian youth self-censoring online for fear of repercussions*
• Al Jazeera. (2025, February 1). *The PA and Israel are allies in silencing the truth*
• Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies. (2021, June 11). *Systematic digital repression: Social media censoring of Palestinian voices*
• Euronews. (2024, October 7). *Human rights NGOs say social media platforms continue to censor pro-Palestine content*
• Amnesty International. (2023, November 1). *Global: Social media companies must step up crisis response on Israel-Palestine as online hate and censorship proliferate*
• El País. (2023, December 27). *Censorship of pro-Palestinian voices on social media soars amid war in Gaza*
• Electronic Frontier Foundation. (2023, November 8). *Platforms must stop unjustified takedowns of posts by and about Palestinians*
• The Guardian. (2023, October 21). *Pro-Palestinian views face suppression in US amid Israel-Hamas war*
• Al Jazeera. (2021, May 15). *Digital apartheid: Palestinians being silenced on social media*
• Ilaian, N. (2024, May 4). *Digital oppression: Censorship of Palestinian voices in social media warfare*. Medium
• TRT World. (2024, November). *Digital suppression of Palestine: Over 500 violations documented in a month*
• Raseef22. (2024, October). *Shushed narratives: Overcoming social media bans to ensure Palestinian stories are heard*
• The New York Editorial Desk. (2024, December 18). *Facebook’s restrictions on Palestinian news during Israel-Gaza war*. The New York Editorial
• Wikipedia contributors. (n.d.). *Quds News Network*. Wikipedia. Retrieved June 4, 2025
• Wikipedia contributors. (n.d.). *Al-Watan (Palestine)*. Wikipedia. Retrieved June 4, 2025

Facebook Shadow Protocols: Web Weaponized Against Palestinian Genocide Discourse