Some Crucial Features of Contemporary Warfare: War Crimes and Warlordism »

Our Algorithmic Inquisition: How Google, YouTube, Facebook, and Bing Became the Iron Maidens of Speech

May 12th, 2025

By Tracy Turner

Our Algorithmic Inquisition: How Google, YouTube, Facebook, and Bing Became the Iron Maidens of Speech

I. Prologue: The Age of Filtered Perception

We were promised a digital renaissance. We got a velvet dystopia.

Once marketed as the Gutenberg presses of the 21st century, Google, YouTube, Facebook, and Bing now function as an Unholy Quadrumvirate of perception managers. Cloaked in the priestly robes of "community standards" and "trust and safety" and (Government-Corporate) “trusted sources” these corporate juggernauts have abandoned their founding myths of openness and now operate as techno-theocratic enforcement arms of empire. What they call "content moderation" is, in effect, algorithmic heresy hunting—replete with excommunications, digital burnings-at-the-stake, and silent disappearances into the shadow realm of the unseen feed.

You realize they are stuffing “community standards” down your throat like really bad Castor-Oil, choking the life out of you with their “medicine.” Sundar Pichai, Neal Mohan, Mark Zuckerberg, and Satya Nadella are exorcizing your memory of what it meant to be free right out of your soul.

II. Google: The Index of Erasure

Google once vowed to "organize the world’s information." What it does now is curate memory. Its autocomplete suggestions steer thought. Its search results bury dissent. Its algorithms punish deviation from orthodoxy—not based on truth, but on consensus engineered in conference rooms from Google Mountain View to CIA Langley.

In 2019, Project Nightingale revealed Google’s quiet partnership with Ascension Health to vacuum up private health data from millions without patient consent. But while it censors "medical misinformation" on YouTube, it simultaneously monetizes opaque corporate health arrangements shielded from public scrutiny.

When asked about controversial content in 2021, CEO Sundar Pichai said Google aims to "elevate authoritative sources." Translation: truth is now issued by credentialed gatekeepers. The scientific method—question, test, revise—is reduced to compliance with a narrative.

III. YouTube: Synod of the Silicon Tribunal

YouTube has become the high court of orthodoxy. It demonetizes the heterodox, deplatforms the unclean, and rewards compliant creators with algorithmic indulgences. Its censorship is spectral—not by iron gavel, but by absence: disappearances, non-recommendations, vanishing from search. Millions are banned, weekly. The rest, self-censor in true Stockholm Syndrome style.

During COVID-19, YouTube's policy was not to allow any content that contradicted the WHO—even as the WHO itself reversed positions on masks, airborne transmission, and vaccine effectiveness.

Another: In 2017, YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki declared that the platform must reduce "borderline content"—videos that don’t violate policy but are nonetheless buried or their authors banned. This Orwellian middle space—where you are neither guilty nor free—is the new normal.

IV. Facebook: The Ecclesiastical Panopticon

Facebook was never a digital town square; its roots are military industrial complex (DARPA LifeLog). It is a sanctimonious surveillance cathedral. It monitors private messages, manipulates visibility, and flags forbidden knowledge not with rebuttal—but with erasure. All discussion of Gaza and Lavender AI Killing Fields is erased.

Facebook partnered with the Atlantic Council—NATO’s propaganda wing—for election "integrity" oversight. Military-aligned NGOs now influence what your aunt can share about her vote.

In 2020, internal documents (now part of the "Facebook Files") showed that Facebook’s own staff admitted: "We are not neutral." From COVID to Ukraine, to Palestine, to gender debates—its policies are aligned with the geopolitical whims of advertisers, intel agencies, and transnational NGOs.

V. Bing (Live): The Quiet Censor

Microsoft’s Bing—less spotlighted, more insidious—functions as Google’s less ostentatious twin. It implements the same search suppressions but with fewer watchdogs and even less transparency. Google and Bing do not compete; rather, they Yin and Yang.

Bing’s AI (now integrated into Windows and Office products) has quietly begun rejecting queries and summarizing only pre-approved sources. The model won’t return certain results about Israeli surveillance, anti-vaccine litigation, or political dissent in Europe. It doesn't break the rules; it rewrites them in advance.

VI. Content Moderation: The Lie That Cloaks the Leash

They say it's about harm reduction. They say it’s about safety. But "content moderation" is the industrial sanitation of narrative. It is the moral laundering of censorship through euphemism.

Every empire has its scribes. Ours are programmers.

Every church had its heretics. Ours are "terms-of-service violators."

Every totalitarian state had its language police. Ours are fact-checkers funded by Pfizer, NATO, or the Open Society Foundation.

VII. The Pretense Cracks, The Empire Digitizes

The emperor not only has no clothes—he outsourced his wardrobe to Google.

What we face is not a tech problem. It is a governance crisis masquerading as a platform policy. These corporations have become soft-governments—immune to law, accountable to no one, and armed with the digital equivalents of the Index Librorum Prohibitorum.

We must not ask them to be better gods. We must expose them as fraudulent priests.

The digital colosseum is built. The lions are algorithms. And dissent is the last unpermitted upload.

VIII. The Existential Paradox, “Smart” Brain-Drain

We live in an era of Ouroboros, where what is most needed on Earth, Existentially is brainpower to solve complex existential crises (the usual suspects: famine, pollution, overpopulation, war, et al). What the Governments and Tech Industrialists offer us in lieu of smart solutions is their own obscene profits, another 250’ Yacht. Censorship, post-ignorance, post-free-speech, post freedom-of-association, and post-free press. The “Scientific Solutions” to impending resource depletion and overpopulation, wars for food, farmland, oil are Dacha for Oligarchs, “News”-Girl Tarts in see-through dresses in public.

IV. The Existential Paradox: The Rise of Silicon Pharaohs in a Dying World

The world teeters on a precipice of extinction-level crises: climate chaos, mass migration, biospheric collapse, nuclear saber-rattling, algorithmic unemployment, antibiotic failure—and what does Silicon Valley give us? Filters. NFTs. “Enhanced engagement.” Artificial idiocy cloaked as Artificial Intelligence. In a century that demands Galileo-grade minds, we are governed by merchants of dopamine drip and monetized narcissism.

The grotesque irony is that the brightest mathematical minds of our age—those who might've cured cancer, reversed desertification, or designed an equitable energy grid—are instead shackled to code farms, optimizing ad targeting so an algorithm can whisper shapewear for moms into your skull at 3:12 a.m. That’s not innovation; that’s algorithmic necromancy. It's the zombification of genius.

This is ideology in its purest form—when your smartest minds are neutralized not by gulag, but by Google campus perks.” Infinite cold brew. Ping pong tables. And a moral vacuum so cold and sterile it could be used to store donor organs.

Meanwhile, the Earth burns.

While coastlines drown and aquifers dry up, tech oligarchs posture as techno-Messiahs. Bezos erects a 10,000-year clock in a desert mountain while warehouse workers piss in bottles. Musk buys a social network to cosplay Voltaire, then bans satire like a bored sultan in a digital caliphate. Zuckerberg? He pours billions into a plastic metaverse while his real platform helps destabilize democracies like it's a game of Risk. They do not plan to fix this world. They are building exit ramps: Mars colonies, tax havens, offshore bunkers, and private islands wired with surveillance-grade Wifi. The rest of us will get Terms of Service and biometric compliance.

Let’s be clear: this is not a conspiracy. It is a business model.

In the old feudal order, peasants paid tithes to priests who promised salvation. In the new globalist order, we pay data tithes to platforms that promise convenience—but deliver only cognitive fragmentation, curated unreality, and the slow euthanasia of civic literacy. Your online life is not “free.” It is monetized behavioral exhaust. You are the product, the lab rat, the test group, the yield.

A velvet chokehold wrapped in euphemism. They say, “trust and safety,” but mean compliance and silence. They say, “community guidelines,” but enforce hegemonic preference. They say “misinformation,” but censor dissent.

Let’s name it.

This isn’t just censorship. This is ontological control—the algorithmic arbitration of what may exist within the shared cognitive commons. The techno-priests don’t just ban your words. They ban your capacity to be seen, heard, known. A person not indexed might as well not exist.

This is the death of pluralism by 1,000 shadowbans.
The cremation of critical thought by “quality scores.”

The ritual sacrifice of reason to the great god “Engagement.”

If we were serious about planetary survival, we’d be holding emergency councils on post-capitalist tech infrastructure, on planetary stewardship, on equitable intelligence—not baking longer TikToks into Instagram or letting OpenAI draft grocery lists while Gaza burns and Mumbai floods.

Instead, we are anesthetized by convenience, scrolling while Rome livestreams.

And so, we reach the paradox: Never before has humanity had so much capacity to know, and never before has it been so ruthlessly steered into curated ignorance. The digital library of Alexandria is here. But the librarians work for advertising departments, and the scribes wear hoodies signed by Raytheon.

We are not witnessing a renaissance. We are living through an epilogue.

Unless we wake up, history will record this not as the birth of a global brain, but the lobotomy of a species that traded its prophets for platforms.

X. The Metric Mandarins: Philanthro-Colonialism and the Infrastructure of Obedience

It is no longer enough to call them monopolies. Google, Facebook, Microsoft, and their orbiting technocults are not merely private corporations. They are sovereign entities, issuing invisible laws, conducting information warfare, and enforcing digital compliance at a scale no government ever dared dream.

Their charters are not constitutions. Their mandates are not elected. Their accountability is nil.

But what makes them truly dangerous is not just their power—it's the ideological Teflon they’ve wrapped themselves in. They are no longer just businesses. They are missionaries. And their gospel is metricism.

Allo, Jigsaw, Hack Harassment, Google Perspective: The Digital Guillotine of Modern Tyranny

There’s a war being waged against you—not with bullets, but with data. Not in dark alleys, but in your devices. And the AI weapons being used have names you’ve probably never questioned—until now: Allo. Jigsaw. Hack Harassment, Google Perspective.

These aren’t just tools. They’re the four horsemen of the digital apocalypse—the foot soldiers of ‘soft’ tyranny. They don’t break down your door; they break into your phone. They don’t shout threats; they whisper them through apps, updates, and silence.

The Religion of the Graph

In the Temple of the Algorithm, truth is what trends, morality is what “scales,” and virtue is whatever reduces churn. The sacred texts are analytics dashboards. The clergy wear Patagonia vests and speak in tongues—Python, SQL, ESG, DEI. The old gods—Reason, Debate, Disputation—have been replaced by KPIs, engagement loops, and “frictionless experience.” In the world they’re building, inconvenience is heresy.

The user believes they are free because they clicked. The system believes it’s ethical because it is optimized for brain retention. Meanwhile, reality is nowhere to be found.

And when these corporate priests descend from their surveillance clouds, it is not to empower—but to colonize.

Philanthropy as Occupation

Bill Gates funds public health while privately influencing the WHO and pharmaceutical policy via foundations with more budget than most nations. Zuckerberg donates to “election integrity” while his algorithms radicalize the electorate. Google builds internet infrastructure in Africa, only to embed tracking, ad systems, and pre-filtered search. This is not charity. This is soft colonialism—a buy-in into governance without consent, ownership without occupation.

"Philanthropist" used to mean lover of humanity. Now it means oligarch with a PR indoctrination budget.

And don’t be fooled by their eco-initiatives, either. When Bezos funds climate research while operating one of the most carbon-intensive delivery empires on Earth, it’s not contradiction—it’s laundering. The same way old robber barons-built libraries to mask the child labor that paid for them, today’s techno-barons build “climate labs” to offset the scorched Earth they helped monetize.

Data is the New Doctrine

Your habits are not private. Your speech is not free. Your mind is not sovereign.

Every typed query, paused scroll, whispered “Hey Siri”—each is a devotional act in the Church of Infinite Extraction, where attention is tithe, and obedience is built through learned helplessness. Don't like your feed? Complain. The system will file it under “user dissatisfaction,” tweak the UX—and continue on, unchanged.

Because you are not the stakeholder. You are the substrate.

These companies no longer need to ban books. They simply make them disappear from search. No fire. No fuss. Just a whisper in the machine: “No results found.”

And what of the supposed regulators? Captured. Tech writes the white papers. Tech funds the research. Tech hires the staffers post-FCC. This isn’t a revolving door—it’s a carousel of complicity.

We Are Building the Panopticon Ourselves

The true horror isn’t that they’re spying. It’s that we built it for them.

We begged them to watch us. We installed the microphones. We geotagged our own lives. We fed the beast in exchange for hearts, retweets, and simulated relevance. And now we can’t look away, because our very selves—our work, our identities, our social standing—are fused to the machine.

We are livestock with Stockholm syndrome. Cattle with smartphones.

And so, we end with this bitter aphorism:

The future won’t be boot-stamping-on-a-face totalitarianism. It will be your child’s face, beaming in soft light, repeating a TikTok while the plastic-nano-particle water rises and your rights dissolve silently into metadata.

There is no opting out.

There is no uprising—only assimilation.

Our Algorithmic Inquisition: How Google, YouTube, Facebook, and Bing Became the Iron Maidens of Speech

###

© 2025 Tracy Turner

No feedback yet

Voices

Voices

  • By Tracy Turner I. Prologue: The Age of Filtered Perception We were promised a digital renaissance. We got a velvet dystopia. Once marketed as the Gutenberg presses of the 21st century, Google, YouTube, Facebook, and Bing now function as an Unholy…
  • Dr. Vladislav B. Sotirović War Crimes and War Criminals After WWII, there was a growing number of significant non-state actors in international relations (IR), like the United Nations (UN) or various specialist agencies connected to it. Nevertheless,…
  • Bridget Vira Sanders Despite its moral framing as a protector of life and family, the Catholic Church has long played a central — and arguably detrimental — role in promoting population growth in the Global South. Under the steely moral gaze of Pope…
  • By David Swanson, World BEYOND War People sometimes get away with a certain kind of evil action precisely because most of us have a hard time imagining the levels of cruelty or cynicism involved. Rahm Emanuel, booster of militarization in Japan as U.S.…
  • google uses their ad program to exert monetary pressure on websites in order to restrict their content and ultimately their freedom of speech. It isn't about telling people how to construct bombs or pornography, it isn't about any of the shocking and…
  • Tracy Turner The College of Cardinals elected Robert Francis Prevost on May 8, 2025, as the 267th pope of the Roman Catholic Church, a record since he was the first-born American pontiff. His election, which was international news, was not only…
  • By Mark Aurelius "Fate is the hand of the gods." Sophocles "In the end we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends." Martin Luther King "We are not creatures of circumstance; we are creators of circumstance." Benjamin…
  • Tracy Turner We are living in a time when the distinction between the true and the false has receded into the distance. Truth is not found—it is made. It is the age of synthetic reality, a masterfully crafted simulacrum in which government dominance,…
  • Paul Craig Roberts The foreign policy of the United States is in the hands of the least capable, most uninformed, and most reckless morons the American education system has yet produced, and their successors, if any, will be worse. American aggression…
  • by Janet Campbell Image via Pexels In the ever-evolving landscape of leadership, remaining static is not an option. Community leaders are the pulse of neighborhoods, towns, and cities, often acting as the bridge between diverse populations and policy,…
May 2025
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

  XML Feeds

CMS + email marketing
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted articles and information about environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. This news and information is displayed without profit for educational purposes, in accordance with, Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Thepeoplesvoice.org is a non-advocacy internet web site, edited by non-affiliated U.S. citizens. editor
ozlu Sozler GereksizGercek Hava Durumu Firma Rehberi Hava Durumu Firma Rehberi E-okul Veli Firma Rehberi