« Judas Goat Jill Stein, Following in Sanders’ FootstepsHas Donald Trump Been Drugged? »

Professor who correctly forecast Trump's victory predicts possible impeachment for the president-elect

November 18th, 2016

CNBC.com staff
Academic: Trump will be impeached

Academic: Trump will be impeached

Donald Trump caught the world by surprise when he emerged victorious at the U.S. elections, but his stay at the White House could be short-lived, according to a professor who has correctly predicted presidential poll outcomes for the last 30 years.

Allan Lichtman, a political historian at the American University, told CNBC's "Squawk Box" on Thursday that Trump's history of playing "fast and loose with the law," his unpredictability as well as lack of public service experience could lead to an impeachment.

He added the prognostication was based on a 'gut feeling' rather than the scientific methods he employed in predicting Trump's election victory.

Since winning the election last week, Trump, along with his Vice President-elect Mike Pence, has been trying to fill out key posts in his Cabinet. Reports, however, hinted at the strain his transition team was under in setting up a new administration.

Trump also faced backlash when he appointed Steve Bannon, the former president of Breitbart News, as his chief strategist and senior counselor.

"Trump is a wild card," Lichtman said, adding Bannon's appointment would be a litmus test for the President-elect to either jettison him or stick with him no matter how controversial he became.
Though Republicans have won the majority in Congress, Lichtman pointed out they did not have a "filibuster-proof majority" in the Senate. Trump's appointment of controversial figures like Bannon and his unpredictability could make it more difficult for the Republicans to work with Democrats and other members of the Congress, he said.

"Republicans love control and they would love to see Mike Pence as president because he is predictable and controllable - a down-the-pipe standard conservative Republican."
Lichtman's predictions on presidential election outcomes were based on history. Appearing on CNBC in October, Lichtman explained he looked at 13 "keys" he developed by studying every election from 1860 to 1980 and then applied it to the next eight elections.

The way his method worked was if six or more "keys" went against the incumbent party at the White House, its candidate would likely lose the election. In the October interview, Lichtman said there were six "keys" that were against the Democratic party.
To-date, only two presidents have been involved in formal impeachment trials by the Senate - Andrew Johnson in 1868 and Bill Clinton in 1999.

Click here to listen to the complete Allan Lichtman interview.

— Follow CNBC International on Twitter and Facebook.

No feedback yet

Voices

Voices

  • By Tracy Turner Filed under: Surveillance, Empire, Technocracy and Statist Media Behind the hidden rooms of empire, where budgets are secret and acronyms speak like tongues, the real governance of the United States does not follow law but latency. The…
  • By Tracy Turner Inside the brutal rise of AI-powered empire-states—where warlords, machines, and memory collide from Gaza to Ukraine and beyond. Introduction: The Builders of the All-Seeing War Machine History’s final emperors will not ride into the…
  • Cathy Smith Act I: The Summoning The summons arrived the way it always does in the digital age: without ceremony and without soul. A little red dot. A cheerful ding. A command masquerading as a request: “We need a quick video to confirm you’re human.”…
  • A prophetic and theological critique of global surveillance systems through the lens of the Bible, Koran, and Torah. This article examines AI technologies like Project Lavender, Palantir, and predictive policing, contrasting them with the compassionate omniscience of El Roi—the God Who Sees. By invoking scripture, prophecy, and Orwellian warnings, it exposes the ethical and spiritual dangers of modern techno-authoritarianism.
  • Ned Lud Book I: The Image of the Beast “He had eyes like a flame of fire, and on his head were many crowns... And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them...” — Revelation 13:7, 19:12 "And he causeth all, both small and…
  • From Reddit bunkers to passport enclaves, millions of men are vanishing from marriage, dating, and civic life—not out of hatred, but exhaustion. In the age of HR authoritarianism and DEI dogma, the modern man isn’t toxic—he’s tired. This image captures…
  • Tracy Turner Fig. 1 As in 1914, tangled alliances (U.S.-NATO-Israel vs. Russia-China-Houthis), economic warfare (sanctions, Red Sea blockades), and rogue actors (Houthi missiles, AI decapitation strikes) hurtle humanity toward nuclear brinkmanship.…
  • Dr. Vladislav B. Sotirovic The unified German Empire, proclaimed in Versailles in January 1871, contemplated balancing the division of the world’s colonies, the markets, and the sources of the world’s raw material.¹ Exceptionally, the pan-Germanic…
  • By Chris Spencer Conspiracy Theory and Conspiracy Theorist are government monikers, designed to discredit, silence, obfuscate and change real government overreach and malfeasance into lunatic fringe. Victims of Directed Energy Weapons in the U.S. end up…
  • Copyright © 2025 National Endowment for Democracy Artificial Intelligence has become autocrats’ newest tool for surveilling, targeting, and crushing dissent. Activists must learn how to harness it in the fight for freedom. By Albert Cevallos     Online…
May 2025
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

  XML Feeds

powered by b2evolution
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted articles and information about environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. This news and information is displayed without profit for educational purposes, in accordance with, Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Thepeoplesvoice.org is a non-advocacy internet web site, edited by non-affiliated U.S. citizens. editor
ozlu Sozler GereksizGercek Hava Durumu Firma Rehberi Hava Durumu Firma Rehberi E-okul Veli Firma Rehberi