« America and Turkey: Rogue Imperial PartnersPutin’s Annual Federal Assembly Address »

Britain Launches Naked Aggression on Syria

December 4th, 2015

by Stephen Lendman

Britain is a longstanding US imperial partner, involved in virtually all its wars of aggression - four post-9/11.

It’s been covertly bombing Syrian targets jointly with US warplanes since last year, along with Israel, France, Canada and Australia - on the phony pretext of combating ISIS.

Now it’s official after parliament voted 397 to 223 for war (a nearly two-thirds majority), following nearly a half-day debate - dozens of Labour and Lib Dem MPs joining with hawkish Torries.

Labour Leader Jeremy Corbyn’s strong opposition didn’t help. In response to the vote, he twittered: “I have argued, and will continue to do so, that we should re-double our efforts to secure a diplomatic and political end to the conflict in Syria.”

“British service men and women will now be in harm’s way and the loss of innocent lives is sadly almost inevitable.”

Corbyn’s shadow foreign secretary Hilary Benn disgracefully supported Prime Minister David Cameron’s rage for war - naked aggression against Syria and its people already begun. More on this below.

Ignoring Cameron’s real objective, Benn said “(w)e must now confront this evil. It is now time for us to do our bit in Syria.”

He knows full well Britain’s involvement is naked aggression on sovereign Syria, its infrastructure, other government targets, perhaps military ones to follow, and its entire population, suffering hugely since Obama illegally declared war in March 2011, using ISIS and other takfiri terrorists as imperial foot soldiers, supplemented since last year by US air power and now growing numbers of special forces on the ground.

US, UK, French, Canadian, Israeli and Australian military operations (with Germany posed to join them) are flagrantly illegal - conducted without Security Council authorization.

Russia’s campaign fully complies with international law - following Assad’s request for help in battling terrorism, focusing solely on ISIS and other takfiri targets throughout the country, scrupulously avoiding civilian casualties - polar opposite how Washington and coalition partners operate, killing more noncombatants than militants in all their wars.

Perhaps worse than ever horrors afflicting long-suffering Syrians is now underway - Cameron openly partnering with Obama’s aggression, along with other coalition partners - on the phony pretext of combating terrorism.

Hypocrisy and endless wars of aggression define Obama’s legacy. Since taking office in January 2009, he broke every major promise made, domestic and geopolitical - notably on US Middle East, North Africa and Central Asia policy, pledging hope, change, peace, democratic values, “a new era of openness,” and willingness to engage virtually all world heads of state diplomatically.

Instead he delivered confrontation with Moscow and Beijing, along with endless imperial wars, from day one in office to now, raging in multiple theaters, about to be escalated in Syria - perhaps Iran, Russia and China to follow, during his tenure or his successor’s.

The threat of another global war is greater than any time since the late 1930s - today’s super-weapons making ones used in that era look like toys.

Hours after Britain’s parliament approved war on Syria, four Cyprus-based Royal Air Force Tornadoes joined with US warplanes, launching lawless airstrikes, hitting no ISIS targets. Britain’s Defense Ministry withheld information on sites struck.

Obama issued a statement, saying “(w)e look forward to having British forces flying with the coalition over Syria, and will work to integrate them into our coalition air-tasking orders as quickly as possible.”

Russia alone is waging real war on terrorism. Washington and coalition partners represent pure evil - enemies of world peace and stability.

Britain’s Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond issued an ominous statement, saying “(a)irstrikes alone will not finish ISIL,” suggesting a Western ground campaign to come.

Perhaps all-out US-led war will follow - aiming to replace Assad with a pro-Western puppet, why Obama launched war in the first place.

Russia’s effective intervention changed things dramatically, clashing with Washington’s imperial objectives.

Could Syria become a flashpoint for US-Moscow confrontation, risking the unthinkable, possible nuclear war ahead?

-###-

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

His new book as editor and contributor is titled "Flashpoint in Ukraine: How the US Drive for Hegemony Risks World War III".

http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanIII.html

Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com.

Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.

It airs three times weekly: live on Sundays at 1PM Central time plus two prerecorded archived programs.

No feedback yet

Voices

Voices

  • Fred Gransville I. A Pill Nation: The New Face of an Old Experiment Imagine a mother at the pharmacy counter with prescription in hand, wavering under the pharmacist's gaze. Her seven-year-old has been diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity…
  • By David Swanson, World BEYOND War photo: wrp.org.uk Have you read “The Case for Military Intervention to Stop the Gaza Genocide“? I don’t mind promoting it to you, since I agree with most of it (and also consider most of it to do absolutely nothing to…
  • By Sally Dugman ...give up conforming to “group-think”... From my angle, a not entirely true assessment exists and here is excerpted from it, from Martin Armstrong’s article: The Domestic Civil Disturbance Quick Reaction Force The people have lost all…
  • © 2025 Tracy Turner From Reagan’s smile to Trump’s pill of control, America’s descent into the hybrid dystopia is no longer fiction—it is the spectacle we live, the sedation we swallow, the surveillance we obey. America in 2025 is Orwellian, Huxleyean,…
  • By Gabriel Aguirre, World BEYOND War The presence of more than 877 military bases around the world, with at least 76 of them in Latin America, together with the presence of the Fourth Fleet, constitute a real threat to peace and stability in the world…
  • By Mark Aurelius Three momentous words: cataclysm, catastrophe and apocalypse all in one title? How to deflate all this hyperbole (if it can be done)? Well, at least this is not blatant statement about a nuclear war? Although there could be that as well…
  • © 2025 Ted Wrong A raw confession of faith from the margins—where loyalty to Christ defies politics, church labels, and “types” of Christians. From the depths of the political and spiritual wilderness, I make a…
  • Katherine Smith PhD How land reform, privatizations of strategic minerals, and Israel's balancing act reveal the economics driving the war in Ukraine The Western media have oversimplified the war in Ukraine into morality drama theater: democracy vs.…
  • By David Swanson, World BEYOND War "Lord of the Flies is a story made up by a disturbed Nazi..." Did you know that the murders and rapes and free-for-all violent chaos in New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina didn’t actually happen, and that the…
  • By Sally Dugman It, I suppose, is really easy to denigrate and castigate Jews as a whole after watching them laughingly slaughter Palestinian civilians of all ages about which I wrote here: Red Light—Green Light And Other Games Played by Children And…
Censorship is not safety. It is authoritarianism in disguise. Bing is not just a search engine—it is an information gatekeeper. Click the red button to email MSN and Bing.com executives. This message challenges their censorship of ThePeoplesVoice.org and demands transparency, algorithmic fairness, and an end to suppression of free expression.
August 2025
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

  XML Feeds

Blog software
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted articles and information about environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. This news and information is displayed without profit for educational purposes, in accordance with, Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Thepeoplesvoice.org is a non-advocacy internet web site, edited by non-affiliated U.S. citizens. editor
ozlu Sozler GereksizGercek Hava Durumu Firma Rehberi Hava Durumu Firma Rehberi E-okul Veli Firma Rehberi