| « US Considers Ways to Keep Its Military Presence in Niger | South Korea To Run "NUCLEAR ATTACK" Evacuation Drill August 23 » |
Bridges v. Houston Methodist Hospital
Link: https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/bridges-v-houston-methodist-hospital
Court decisions supporting the conclusion that vaxx recipients are military targets, enemy combatants, chattel slaves or similar legal status in which consent is moot. | Introduction: Below are lightly-edited email exchanges from the last couple of weeks, about Bridges v. Houston Methodist Hospital as a primary indicator that the legal status of each recipient of unidentified, unregulated, injectable biochemical products has been something other than a ‘human subject’ or ‘clinical trial subject’ (in relation to a clinical investigator) or ‘patient’ (in relation to a physician). ● This has been true since January 2020 when then-HHS-Secretary Alex Azar established ‘public health emergency’ conditions on American soil, which remain in effect to the present and will remain in effect until Congress repeals 42 USC 247d, 21 USC 360bbb, and all their related statutory tentacles, through which Congress has transferred — to the HHS Secretary — unilateral, unreviewable power to declare and maintain public health emergency status and direct biochemical attacks on the American people camouflaged as ‘vaccination’ programs.
No feedback yet
