Pages: << 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ... 1269 >>
Be the Spark: Turning Conviction into Community Action
Janet Campbell
Image: Freepik
When you care deeply about a cause, it’s natural to want to make an impact. But taking meaningful action in your community isn’t just about passion—it’s about strategy, persistence, and connection. Whether you’re advocating for social justice, environmental sustainability, or local economic growth, your individual actions can create a ripple effect. The key is to move beyond awareness and channel your energy into tangible change. Here’s how you can turn your beliefs into impactful efforts that shape your community for the better.
Start by Educating Yourself and Others
Before you take action, it’s essential to deepen your understanding of the cause you’re passionate about. Research local and global perspectives, engage with experts, and read credible sources to grasp the complexities involved. But learning shouldn’t stop with you—share your knowledge with others through conversations, social media, or community events. When people understand the nuances of an issue, they’re more likely to get involved, and you can help create a more informed and engaged community.
The Democrats Are Standing Against America
Paul Craig Roberts and Larry Sparano Discuss the Fight Ahead
This is my interview by Larry Sparano of a few days ago prior to my learning, as I posted yesterday, that the temporary injunctions that judges are issuing against Trump and Musk’s activities in rooting out corruption from the federal budget are only good for a few days and are not effective except in the sense of giving the corrupt elements in the federal departments and agencies a few days to hide, erase, destroy, and “lose” evidence before Musk can get his hands on it.
To be effective in blocking Trump, the hearing on the temporary injunction must succeed in advancing to a preliminary injunction, which is a rare event. If a temporary injunction becomes a preliminary injunction, that is when it enters the appeal process and becomes subject to the long delay of the judicial process. The hearings on the temporary injunctions against Trump and Musk are resulting in the dismissal of the injunctions and are not carrying forward to preliminary injunctions.
The US Government’s Reportedly Shifting Rhetoric Towards Russia-Ukraine Is Significant
Andrew Korybko
Andrew Korybko's Newsletter
The US could move its nascent “New Détente” with Russia further along by either forcing the G7 and UNGA Resolution sponsors to change their language about “Russian aggression” or refusing to attach its name to their respective documents on the third anniversary of the special operation if they don’t.
The Financial Times and Reuters reported that the US Government (USG) respectively refuses to endorse a joint statement from the G7 and a proposed UNGA Resolution that include the phrase “Russian aggression”, instead allegedly proposing more neutral language like the “Ukrainian Conflict”. That would be extremely significant if true since the US wields more political influence across the world than any other country and can therefore herald a sea change in official global opinion by shifting its rhetoric.
Whose Gold, if anyone’s, Is in Ft. Knox
Paul Craig Roberts
If there is gold in Ft. Knox, whose is it?
Many bullion dealers believe that any gold in Ft. Knox is not ours. Over the decades the gold was “leased” to bullion dealers who sold it into the gold market, thereby protecting the value of the dollar by holding down the gold price.
“Leasing” the gold means that the US can still claim to own the gold. A sale has to be recorded or reported, but not a “lease.”
Gold might also have disappeared through rehypothecation, which is the use by one party of another party’s asset to back their own financial or borrowing practices. The gold of other countries is also in Ft. Knox. Earlier this century, Germany requested its gold from Ft. Knox, and was told that the gold would be returned in seven years. This indicates that the gold was used by Washington for some other purpose and was unavailable to be returned to Germany.
From the History of Western War Crimes: The Dresden Massacre (February 1945)
Dr. Vladislav B. Sotirovic
“Dresden was known as a city that was overcrowded by up to 500,000 German refugees from the east.”
The Three Men of Slashing
It was in May/September 1945 when WWII ended – the bloodiest and most horrible war ever fought in human history. The war that caused the creation of the UNO in 1945 to protect the world from similar events in the future – a pan-global political-security organization that first issued a legal act was a Charter of the UN which inspired the 1948 Geneva Convention’s definition of genocide.
The Nüremberg and Tokyo Trials were organized as “The Last Battles” for justice as the first ever global trials for war criminals and mass murderers including the top-hierarchy statesmen and politicians. However, 80 years after WWII the crucial moral question still needs a satisfactory answer: Are all the WWII war criminals faced justice at the Nüremberg and Tokyo Trials? Or at least those who did not escape from public life after the war. Here we will present only one of those cases from WWII which has to be characterized as the genocide followed by the personalities directly responsible for it: The 1945 Dresden Massacre.
The 1945 Dresden Raid was surely one of the most destructive air raids during WWII but in world history of massive military destruction and war crimes against humanity too.¹ The main and most destructive air raid was during the night of February 13th −14th, by the British Bomber Command when 805 bomber military crafts attacked the city of Dresden which up to that time was protected from similar attacks primarily for two reasons:
Financial Parasitism and the Death of Free Markets: A Timeline of Economic Manipulation
Robert David
What if the so-called 'free market' was never free? What if the all-seeing eye that fuels capitalism was a fist squeezing the economy for the benefit of a select few? Influential stakeholders have manufactured financial catastrophes, created monetary regulations, and monopolized markets while masquerading serious competition and meritocratic society.
From the 19th Century's robber barons to today's trillion-dollar asset magnates such as Vanguard, State Street and BlackRock, power has intentionally not been distributed. This timeline breaks down the masterful scheme of capitalism – how the system has been rigged through market deception, manipulation, regulatory capture, and financial parasitism so that the elite do not just continue getting wealthier but assert complete dominance over the system.
Neuroprotective and Neurogenic Actions of Vitamins and Herbs: A Review
Chris Spencer
Abstract
The human brain is a very complex organ that is under constant requirement for repair and maintenance in order to maintain normal function. Neuroprotection and neurogenesis are indispensable processes that save neurons from damage and stimulate the formation of new neurons, respectively. Neuroprotection and neurogenesis engage processes involved in cognition and memory as well as protection against neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's and Parkinson's.
A Critical Examination of Pro-Zionist Media: Bias, Narratives, and the Politics of Representation
Tracy Turner
Storytelling encompasses the most fundamental aspect of journalism, which stems from the fact that every decision made, what to showcase, what to leave out, and how to portray events, can alter how people think. This is more pronounced in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which is a subject that has been engaged as one that goes beyond reporting but rather engages in the art of narrative control (mind control). In defense of the Zionist propaganda, there is always the mind control version of the story that depicts the aggressive occupier's war of self-defense as an attack from terrorists.
A Hope: Can We Achieve It?
Paul Craig Roberts
"Now is the time to close down the whorehouse that is the legacy media."
By seizing the initiative Trump and Musk stole a march on corrupt Democrats and their whore media. The whore media has been destroyed by the large amount of information that came out of the government’s own data clearly demonstrating immense theft from taxpayers by Democrats and misuse of appropriated funds by USAID, National Endowment for Democracy, Social Security and Medicare, US Treasury, Department of Health and Human Services, and the use of federal funds for advertising private abortion clinics and sex change operations–thus the use of our money to contribute to immoral profits, use of taxpayer funds to pay the whore media to lie and deceive the American public, and major blockbusters about to hit with the audits of the Defense Department and IRS, likely the two most corrupt agencies of all.
The Democrats’ corruption of the US budget that Musk revealed before corrupt judges, themselves on the take, could illegally and unconstitutionally delay release of official government data to the cabinet secretaries and the President of the United States elevates the Biden Regime to the most corrupt government in human history. The world has never seen anything like the corruption of the past four years. A world record.
The shame of the Democrat Biden Regime is indelible. America will never live it down.
What’s Wrong With Nuclear Weaponry and Energy
By David Swanson, World BEYOND War
Nuclear Weaponry
“Deterrence”
Pakistan and India obtained nuclear weapons in 1998 and went to war in 1999. The United States and Russia have fought numerous wars against other nations, and in Ukraine against each other (albeit with mainly Ukrainian troops on one side), and often threatened to use nuclear weapons. Russia has threatened to use nuclear weapons in Ukraine. The United States has threatened to use them in North Korea and Iran. None of these threats seem related to deterrence, just as demands to nuke something in popular speech have nothing to do with deterrence. The fact that World War III has not yet engulfed the world is not evidence of nuclear deterrence, the very conception of which is arguably nonsensical. Deterrence depends on making yourself believe that someone else believes that you might do exactly what you are supposedly trying to avoid.
