Please visit the new site here: http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org

 

 
Home · Links · News · Voices · Action · Donate · Mission · Archives · Books · Submissions · Videos · Past News

Voices

04/13/07

Permalink 04:04:56 am, Categories: Voices, 1087 words    

Israel torturing Palestinian child prisoners

Philippe Khan

Appalling photographs of abuse and torture by American guards at U.S. military bases and detention facilities in Iraq and Afghanistan shocked the international community, but the Palestinians have been suffering harsher treatment inside Israeli prisons since the 1967 occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

The Palestinians’ suffering at the hands of the Israelis is worse than in any other part of the world. Many of the Palestinian detainees are children, who are subjected to physical and psychological torture by Israeli interrogators and prison guards.

Mohammed Mahsiri, a 17-year-old resident of Dheisheh refugee camp in the occupied West Bank, was arrested by Israeli occupation forces almost a year and a half ago. "I was taken to a detention centre and interrogated…The interrogation would begin at 2 o'clock in the afternoon and would finish after eleven p.m. I was beaten all the time, especially if the soldiers did not get the answers they wanted,” he told IPS.

"I was sent to be beaten by other soldiers and forced to stand in the rain with only thin clothes on. They would try to convince me that I did something that I did not do in order to get the confession they wanted. After being tortured at the detention centre for one month, I was in prison for 13 months."

Recent reports by human rights groups and legal experts document widespread, systematic violation of international laws at Israeli detention centers, where several prisoners are children under the age of 18, most of whom are subjected to torture, harsh interrogation tactics, physical beatings, deplorable living conditions and no access to fair trial.

Although the International Convention of the Rights of the Child as well as Israeli law defines “a child” as someone under the age of 18, Israeli military order system in force inside the occupied West Bank and Gaza classifies Palestinian children over the age of 16 as adults. The lack of protection afforded to Palestinian child prisoners contrasts sharply with the generous rights and treatment granted to arrested Israeli children.

Conditions in Israeli prisons violate a range of international human rights standards. Palestinian children are isolated from adult Palestinians. Accommodation is overcrowded and unhygienic. There is often not enough bedding or even space for the basic mattresses. Food is very poor and often insufficient. Washing and use of toilets is restricted and children lack access to medical provision and formal education.

Moreover, Palestinian children over 14 years old are tried as adults in Israeli military courts, and are often detained with adult inmates – another direct violation of international law.

Latest figures released by Defense for Children International (DCI), an independent group that defends children’s rights, show that there are 398 Palestinian children currently held inside Israeli detention centers and prisons, the youngest of whom is just 14 years old.

"Usually, the Israeli troops invade the child's house in the middle of the night, in order to frighten the child and his family," Ayed Abuqtaish, research coordinator with DCI’s Ramallah offices. "Many Israeli soldiers and vehicles surround the house, and other soldiers invade or force their way into the house…

"They intimidate the child to prepare him for interrogation. When the child arrives at the interrogation centre, they employ different methods of torture.”

There are widespread accusations of physical abuse, Abuqtaish says, "but currently, they concentrate mainly on psychological torture like sleep deprivation, or depriving him of food or water, or putting him in solitary confinement, or threatening him with the demolition of his home or the arrest of other family members.”

“Children have also reported that the Israeli interrogators have threatened to sexually abuse them,” Abuqtaish added.

Like the United States, Israel defends its interrogation techniques, saying that they are a necessary tool against the “war on terror”. In 1987, according to Israel's Landau Commission of Inquiry into interrogation policies, the Israeli government ruled that "a moderate degree of pressure, including physical pressure, in order to obtain crucial information, is unavoidable under certain circumstances."

"Israel is a state party to the International Convention Against Torture," Abuqtaish said. "In its reports to the committee, Israel always says that their use of 'moderate physical pressure' is consistent with the obligation of the treaty, but, needless to say, 'moderate physical pressure' is obviously torture in itself."

Legal experts, meanwhile, say that the military courts that try Palestinian children are presided over by military personnel, most of whom lack legal qualifications. Moreover, Palestinian child prisoners have no guaranteed right to legal representation and it is extremely difficult for any lawyer to represent Palestinians before these courts.

"The Israeli court system does not look like any other court system in the world," says Arne Malmgren, a Swedish lawyer who has worked as legal observer inside Israeli military courts during trials of Palestinian children. "Israeli military staff, the judge, the prosecutor, the interpreter -- they are all in military uniform. There are plenty of soldiers with weapons inside the courtroom.

"The small children come into the courtroom in handcuffs and full chains; there can be up to seven children at the same time in the courtroom. One lawyer described it as a cattle market. The trial is more like a plea bargain -- before the proceedings, the prosecutor and the lawyer have already agreed on the child's sentence, and then they just ask the judge if he agrees, and he almost always does.”

"There are no witnesses, nothing. And the worst thing is what happened before the child arrives at the courtroom -- when they interrogate these young boys and girls to get them to sign confessions to things they may or may not have done, Malmgren added.

Although the vast majority of arrested Palestinian children are charged with throwing stones at Israeli occupation forces, it’s extremely rare for them to avoid prison sentence, raising concerns that the punishment is based on political conditions rather than on objective legal standards.

Hopefully, when negotiations between Palestinian and Israeli officials continue this week over a possible prisoner exchange deal that may involve the release of all Palestinian woman and children in return for an Israeli occupation soldier captured by Palestinian resistance groups last summer, Palestinians will be able to see their relatives, friends and loved ones again.

"When I was released from prison, it was the best day of my life," said Mohammed Mahsiri, who was recently released from Israeli prisons. "We were beaten every day. The food was very bad. It was the hardest thing we had to face. No child should ever have to experience that."

-###-

© 2007 Philippe Khan

From Islam Online

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: wwet [Member]
I don't see how can anyone refer to international standards and request that Israel adheres to them. Israel is the land of Jews, who suffered from the Holocaust a little too much to measure them with the same standards as everybody else.

Besides, Israel's actions are aimed at the survival of their country and their nation, and, understandably, international laws have less precedence then survival of the whole nation.

Besides, international laws don't apply to the terrorists, so it's not even clear why mentioning them at all.

To state that Palestinian terrorists who put whole Jewish nation in danger, don't deserve the harshest punishment, is effectively the same as calling for another Holocaust.
Permalink 04/13/07 @ 11:35
Comment from: rj [Member]
wwet,
Firstly, the article that you are commenting is about children -CHILDREN- being tortured by the Zionist state. In terms of the law, they are innocent PER DEFINITION. Children are not "terrorists". Let's be clear about this.

Now, the Jewish people suffered immensely from the Holocaust. -Not just "a little too much". This was a suffering that should not have taken place and that should not have been experienced by a single Jew. Every single one of them was INNOCENT.

Part of the many reasons why the Holocaust came about, was precisely BECAUSE Germany chose to break with international juridical and moral standards.

These standards should be upheld and respected by ALL countries. Over the years & centuries, MANY countries and peoples have suffered tremendously. If this misery should be accepted as a valid reason for "exceptionalism", we are all headed for the bottomless pit. So it is far from "understandable" that "survival of a nation" should take precedence over international standards. Very far from it!

The Jewish nation is NOT in danger. The Palestinian nation IS. The "survival of the whole [Jewish] nation" is definitely NOT at stake here. The racist Zionist project is.

International standards DO apply to "terrorists", but they choose not to adhere to them. NOR do the governments that consider themselves to be the standard-bearers of democracy!

Suspending international (and even national) standards of law in order to "punish" people is NOT what democracy is about. By doing this, the governments in question forfeit the very possibility of finding out with any degree of certainty whether a suspect really is guilty or not. Certainty about guilt MUST be established first, unless we want to punish presumably innocent people. And if such certainty can be brought about after DUE PROCESS, even then -even then- international standards should be adhered to and human rights respected by governments.

Would you consider torture, mayhem & murder to be ok when a government does it, but wrong when a gang of terrorists does it? Please consider this question carefully, because it essentially represents the difference between a democracy and a fascist/authoritarian system. Hope to hear from you about this.

:-) rj
Permalink 04/13/07 @ 12:30
Comment from: wwet [Member]
> CHILDREN ... are innocent PER DEFINITION; Children are not "terrorists"

It's a fact that many children do help adult terrorists, or at least have the information about their whereabouts. This makes them accomplices to the terrorism.

> Would you consider torture, mayhem & murder to be ok when a government does it

It depends on the cause. If this is right cause, then yes, it's OK. You have admitted yourself that terrorists don't adhere to the international standards. Thus, it's them who place themselves beyond the law.

If the government is on the right side, if it's fighting for the freedom and democracy, as US and Israel clearly do, then, certainly, the more effective they are in their fight, the better for everyone. Who but a terrorist might oppose the fight for the right cause to be effective?

> The Jewish nation is NOT in danger.

Jewish nation has the right to have their state.
Their state is in danger. Despite the fact that it has the largest and best-equipped army on the Middle East and nuclear weapons, being the only state in the world that did not join the non-proliferation treaty, it is certainly in danger because everyone knows that many Arab countries want to drive them into the sea; besides, Palestinians think that their lands are occupied (when they rightfully belong to Israel) and organize terrorist attacks on Israel. Even if Israel occasionally responds and levels two or three Arab cities to dust, the obvious danger does not go away. And with the time, the danger only grows, since, obviously, with every new piece of land that Israel rightfully seizes, with every new restriction it imposes in order to improve security, with every new Palestinian who dies on the checkpoint, the aggression of evil Arab terrorists towards Israel only grows.

And when Israel is in danger, all Jews are.
Permalink 04/13/07 @ 15:48
Comment from: wwet [Member]
> being the only state in the world that did not join the non-proliferation treaty

that is, the only nuclear state.
Permalink 04/13/07 @ 19:04
Comment from: standoff [Member]
The jews always claim holocaust. But they took part in the slave trade. Black and Native Americans suffered more than jews. Plus A true Jew is Black. But if you let hollywood tell it you would see them look like European. I never read in the bible about mosses getting lost in Europe. European jews are not true orginal jews by birth but by faith. A vote in 1947 or something gave european jews that land. Jews have the best equipment for defending themselves, but still torture kids. You know what is funny that every time a dude blows up himself you can always find his wallet in great condition to the fact you could read his name and address. His check list in the morning before the even is 1. breakfast 2. TNT oh and let me not forget my wallet. Go figure LOL
Permalink 04/13/07 @ 21:03
Comment from: se [Member]
wwet: "Jewish nation has the right to have their state"

No they don't.

They stole the land from the Palestinian people. Briton didn't own Palestine and it wasn't theirs to give to the Jews. The Palestinian people had lived there for hundreds of years before the Jews came and killed them and drove them from their homes, towns, farms, and land.

rj: Would you consider torture, mayhem & murder to be ok when a government does it?

wwet: "It depends on the cause. If this is right cause, then yes, it's OK."

The Nazis thought it was the "right cause" and it was "OK" for them to kill the Jews.

wwet: "It's a fact that many children do help adult terrorists, or at least have the information about their whereabouts. This makes them accomplices to the terrorism."

It's a fact that Israeli snipers shoot Palestinian school children in the head and it’s a fact that the Israeli government uses tanks and helicopters and Hell Fire missiles to blow people apart like rotten fruit.

wwet: "And with the time, the danger only grows, since, obviously, with every new piece of land that Israel rightfully seizes, with every new restriction it imposes in order to improve security, with every new Palestinian who dies on the checkpoint, the aggression of evil Arab terrorists towards Israel only grows."

This statement illustrates much of what is wrong with the skewed and prejudice Israeli mindset.

With every piece of land Israel steals with every draconian restriction the occupier state imposes on an innocent people, with every Palestinian who is brutally murdered by Israel, “the aggression of evil Arab terrorists towards Israel only grows."?

So you think the Arabs are evil for attempting to fight back as they are being killed and repressed and having their land stolen. Would you just have them lie down and die in respect for the Israeli master race?

A corrupt and murderous gang runs the stolen tract of land called Israel. With the help of America they are dragging the world to Armageddon. Who really needs Israel? The occupiers should give the land they call Israel back to the rightful owners, the Palestinian people. The people who have been unjustly settled on the Palestinian people’s land could easily be resettled in America and Europe. The world would be at peace again, no more wars fought to protect a gang of occupiers, and the Jewish people worldwide would be better off without the negative attention, from the actions of the criminal state.
Permalink 04/13/07 @ 23:12
Comment from: wwet [Member]
wwet: "It depends on the cause. If this is right cause, then yes, it's OK."
se: The Nazis thought it was the "right cause" and it was "OK" for them to kill the Jews.

Jews did not threaten to drive Germany into the sea. In case of Nazis, it was offense from them towards the Jews, even though it was going fully in accord with the alliance between them and Zionist movement designed to steer Jews into Palestine. In case of Arabs, Jewish state is only responding to the threat and intent. For example, if you were a state leader and you said what you just said, it would be perfectly justified to destroy your country, so you would not have the chance to materialize your thoughts about Jews not having the right to have theirs. Iran is good example.

> So you think the Arabs are evil for attempting to fight back as they are being killed and repressed and having their land stolen.

It's a chicken and egg problem. From Israel's point of view, Arab terrorists are killed and repressed for attempting to fight forward. If Israel rightfully decides to seize new piece of Palestinian land, then, naturally, it must provide security for the Jewish settlers that will occupy it. Who would deny any state's right and duty to protect its own citizens?

> The people who have been unjustly settled on the Palestinian people’s land could easily be resettled in America and Europe. The world would be at peace again

Where exactly would you suggest to settle them? what country's land to cut? and even if that indeed happened, why do you think that the Palestinian scenario wouldn't repeat itself, the chosen country wouldn't treat Israelis as occupiers, with all that follows?
Permalink 04/14/07 @ 10:33
Comment from: rj [Member]
wwet,
I asked you a question at the end of my answer to your comment:

"Would you consider torture, mayhem & murder to be ok when a government does it, but wrong when a gang of terrorists does it?"

Based on your comment as a whole, I must conclude that you would take the following position: Yes, torture mayhem & murder are ok if a government does this, provided it "is on the right side" (your words). You consider israel to be on the "right side", and consequently you would say that it is ok for israel to torture and murder children.

You fail to present even the remotest trace of analysis in an effort to determine HOW we are to find out who is on the "right side" and indeed, what it is that would make this claim to "rightness" a valid one.

Further, you evidently operate under the norm (?) that 'the end justifies the means'. By your position you have removed even the faintest element of ethics and values from the consideration of 'means'. It may not have dawned on you that the reverse position probably is the better, the more worthy one: 'the means should justify the end'.

Your fascist/tribalistic worship of power takes you to this deeply flawed position: "effectiveness" is everything and 'might makes right'.

Well, I definitely do disagree with these ideas. And so should you 'wwet'. -Germany in the thirties and forties did unspeakably cruel things to the Jews- The German power was tremendous and the Jewish people was powerless and very, very, vulnerable. I'm sure you would agree with me that "might didn't make right" during the horrible Holocaust. So, your position is not even logical. -And your reasoning fatally flawed.

You said: "If Israel rightfully decides to seize new piece of Palestinian land, then, naturally, it must provide security for the Jewish settlers that will occupy it."

Firstly, you said 'if'. It is NOT an established/universally accepted point of view that israel has a right to "seize" (your word) [a] new piece of land. -In common parlance this is called STEALING. It further is in no way "natural" that the Zionist entity should proceed to provide security to the settlers, who in your own words (!) OCCUPY it. Well, they do! They do occupy this stolen land. It should be taken away from them and they will need security no more.

"Who would deny any state's right and duty to protect its own citizens?"

Why, israel isn't even a state in a proper sense. Its putative borders have not even been clearly defined, and its expansionist policies makes this legal work harder. No, they make it impossible. Far from "only responding" (your words), israel has been and is still in an ongoing process of gobbling up ever more Palestinian land, stealing it.

This map tells the story: http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/cgi-bin/blogs/voices.php/2005/08/03/tell_tale_map_1

By studying this map, it becomes very, very clear how wrong you are in commenting that “Palestinians think that their lands are occupied”. Their land is IN FACT occupied. And has been so for a long time. NOTHING of this does rightfully belong to israel. israel has NO RIGHT WHATEVER to exist. The Jewish people DOES have a right to exist. -You fail to distinguish between people and state, between the 'natural' and the 'political'.

The settlers aren't citizens in a proper sense, and they should return to wherever they came from. Returning to Palestine, by the way, is an internationally established right belonging to the Palestinians. Approximately 800.000 of them have so far been denied this right.

By failing to answer my question in a direct and principled way, you have made it necessary for me to conclude that your points of view belong one and all on the fascist/authoritarian side of the political-philosophical equation AND that they can fairly be characterized as TRIBALISTIC. To behave ethically probably is not something that you would consider imperative and hardly even necessary for each and every one of us. The moral decrepitude of the position that you have chosen is utterly shocking. In its atavistic, sheer, unadulterated tribalism, it is Nazism incarnated. Pure evil.

Now, please, my fellow human being, please come to your senses and choose otherwise. -Choose the path of righteousness, the one of justice and dignity for all human beings.

:-) rj
Permalink 04/14/07 @ 14:07
Comment from: wwet [Member]
rj, I give up. Obviously, sarcasm is not something you can sniff.
Permalink 04/16/07 @ 07:43

Posts by day of the Month

October 2008
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
<<  <   >  >>
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Search

Archive

Newsletter

Your E-mail:

Just Foreign Policy Iraqi Death Estimator





Syndicate this blog XML

What is RSS?

thepeoplesvoice.org

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted articles and information about environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. This news and information is displayed without profit for educational purposes, in accordance with, Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Thepeoplesvoice.org is a non-advocacy internet web site, edited by non-affiliated U.S. citizens. editor

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Valid RSS! Valid Atom! b2evolution