Please visit the new site here: http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org

 

 
Home · Links · News · Voices · Action · Donate · Mission · Archives · Books · Submissions · Videos · Past News

Voices

05/25/06

Permalink 02:00:57 am, Categories: Voices, 873 words    

LaRouche Warns of Cheney Plans to Launch Iran Strike in June

By: larouchepac.com

Lyndon LaRouche issued a public warning today, that an ever more desperate Bush Administration, led by Vice President Dick Cheney, is seriously planning a preventive military strike against Iran sometime between now and early July. The warning is based on a series of reports from well-placed military and security sources in the United States and Europe, who point to a particular convergence of developments over this period.

First, European security sources have issued dire warnings of serious terrorist disruptions of the scheduled World Cup soccer tournament, which takes place in a dozen German cities from early June through early July. These widely publicized soccer events are believed to be targeted by so-called hooligan gangs, neo-Nazi youth, and possibly by "Islamist" organizations, according to these security specialists. LaRouche pointed out that all of these countergangs have strong ties to the same European Synarchist financial circles who financed the Mussolini, Hitler, Franco, and Vichy fascist organizations during the 1922-1945 period. The heirs of those Synarchist financiers today are actively involved in promoting a resurgence of a new international fascist apparatus, which was already linked to the Madrid, Spain bombings of March 11, 2004, and which capability extends to Italy and parts of South America, as well as into the Islamic world. This Synarchist apparatus also has special capabilities inside Mexico, dating back to the Mussolini and Hitler period, which still remain deeply embedded in the political and social fabric of the country.

U.S. military and intelligence sources have also reported that, during the month of June, three American and one French naval aircraft carrier group will be converging on Indian Ocean and Persian Gulf waters near Iran. Thus, military assets will be in place, during that time frame, to launch a short-notice attack, ostensibly in "retaliation" for terrorist actions which would be linked to the Tehran regime.

LaRouche cited the growing turbulence in the international financial system as a further motive for such Synarchist circles to act now, to spread chaos throughout much of the planet-just as they did in similar financial collapse conditions during the 1930s. Two leading Synarchist figures with strong ties to the Bush-Cheney Administration, George Shultz and Felix Rohatyn, were singled out by LaRouche in his warnings. Shultz, the political godfather of the Bush-Cheney Administration, and Rohatyn have teamed up in recent years to promote an overhaul of U.S. national security, to an imperial model of preventive war, and the outsourcing of many vital military and national security functions, to so-called Private Military Corporations (PMCs).

LaRouche declared, "I know the desperate state of mind among the Shultz, Rohatyn, Cheney circles in Washington. I know, as do others, that they are seeking the first pretext for a preventive, unwarranted strike against Iran. The confluence of events in June represents the kind of opportunity that, I fear, they will not be willing to pass up. Therefore, I would be remiss were I not to speak out publicly at this moment, warning that these madmen may be contemplating actions that would throw the entire planet into chaos and conflict-at precisely the moment that we need leadership from a combination of sovereign nation-states, working in concert to bring order and prosperity to a world sinking rapidly into a new dark age."

LaRouche continued, "Let me be blunt, perhaps to the point of ruffling some Capitol Hill feathers. There is not a government in the world today, including Iran, that has any interest in disrupting the World Cup soccer tournament in Germany, through some kind of asymmetric warfare action. However, outside of government, there is a fifth column apparatus, known as the Synarchist International, associated with the financing of the interwar and World War II era fascist regimes, which has both the capacity and intent to carry out precisely such a terrorist disruption of the World Cup."

"One is drawn to the parallel," LaRouche continued, "with the Nazi invasion of France in 1940. Contrary to most historical accounts, the cause of the Nazi overrun of France was not the failure of the Maginot Line defenses. The Maginot Line, and similar defenses held against the Hapsburg invaders during the 18th century. The cause of the 1940 fall of France was the presence, within France, of a Synarchist fifth column, associated with the Lazard-sponsored Banque Worms circles."

"The security operations for the World Cup would be technically adequate and competent if the threats were coming exclusively from domestic sources, or even agencies like those behind the infamous 1972 Munich Olympics attacks. However, those capabilities are not geared to dealing with a fifth column operation, of the sort being contemplated by Shultz, Rohatyn, Cheney, and their European Synarchist allies. No conventional defense is adequate to stopping that kind of assault."

"Again, speaking bluntly," LaRouche concluded, "the gravest danger to the world today comes from the Synarchist International-including Shultz, Cheney, and Rohatyn. They are seeking a Reichstag Fire or 9/11-type incident to give them the psychological leverage to launch their pre-planned attack on Iran. That can only be prevented by placing a very powerful public spotlight on their schemes, in advance. That is why I am speaking out today."

-###-

May 25, 2006 By the Lyndon LaRouche Political Action Committee P.O. Box 6157, Leesburg, VA 20178, www.larouchepac.com and Not Authorized by Any Candidate or Candidate's Committee.

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: TJM [Member]
TOP SECRET WESTERN TACTICS TO MAINTAIN RULE BY THE CRAZY MULLAHS IN IRAN

Lyndon LaRcouche's and Jeffrey Steinberg's warnings about a probable U.S. bombing of Iran may be correct. However, as indicated below, such warnings may be more a part of the problem than a part of the solution. Lyndon & Jeffrey may be doing precisely what Dick Cheney, Tony Blair, etc. want them to do.

We may want to feel sorry for President George Bush. He may be ill-advised on Iran. However, British Prime Minister Tony Blair and U.S. V.P. Dick Cheney know better. Blair & Cheney know that Brits have initiated, encouraged, and financed the Muslim Brotherhood and related terrorist groups in dividing and conquering the Middle East to achieve Western economic and geopolitical goals for more than 100 years – especially in Iran. Yes, the Brits, the Yanks, and the rest of the West secretly support the Mullahs in Iran -- whether you and they know it or not.

Most who know the secret history of Iran know that Brits, Yanks, French, Russians, and others used the Muslim Brotherhood to overthrow the Shah of Iran and to install the Muslim clerics (Mullahs) as leaders of Iran in 1979. What fewer people know is that the Mullahs’ secret supporters in the West have kept and supported the Mullahs as the leaders of Iran until this very day. Simply said, since Saddam Hussein is gone, mad Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the crazy Mullahs may be the best enemies that money can buy.

If you do not know the history of the Muslim Brotherhood and its symbiotic control of the Middle East with and by the West, then you may allow the Mullahs’ secret supporters in the West to repeat this history for you. Current British, American, Israeli, and Western policy toward Iran may be an unmitigated farce. If Western leaders truly want to stop or get rid of the crazy Mullahs, then why are they doing and saying all the right things to maintain and to increase the power of the Mullahs in Iran?

What are the Top Secret Western tactics to maintain rule by the Mullahs in Iran? How are the Mullahs’ secret supporters in the West delaying and preventing regime change in Iran? The answers may be Top Secret, but most of the answers are also hidden in plain sight.

#1) Bush & Cheney say that they might invade or nuke Iran. Oh, no! However, what is the perfectly logical result of draconian actions seriously contemplated by two of the least-popular, most-hated leaders in the history of America and the modern world? The people of Iran and the people of the world rush to the Mullahs’ defense. Pretty slick, eh?

#2) Brits, Yanks, and Israelis say that they might bomb Iran to destroy Iran’s nuclear weapons sites. Iran says that they are not making nuclear weapons, and U.S. officials say that Iran will not have a viable nuke for up to 10 years. What is the logical result? The people of Iran and the people of the world rush to the Mullahs’ defense. Pretty slick, eh?

#3) Bush, Blair, and the Europeans say that they will rely on ineffective U.N. sanctions to deter the crazy Mullahs from developing nuclear weapons (for which there is no clear PUBLIC proof). Russians, Chinese, and others are opposed. What result? More nations and more people are now unfortunately supporting the Mullahs. Pretty slick, eh?

#4) Bush, Blair, and others are heavily influenced by oil interests. Continued chaos in the Middle East and in other oil producing areas (the only places where chaos seems to occur) maintains high oil prices by decreasing and threatening supplies. Without Saddam Hussein and currently curtailed Iraqi oil exports and without Iranian President Ahmadinejad and now threatened Iranian oil exports, the price of oil would be substantially lower. British Petroleum, Exxon, and others get richer. You are getting poorer. If you controlled BP, Exxon, and other big oil companies, then who would you want to rule Iraq for 20+ years, and who would you want to rule Iran for more than 27 years? Pretty slick, eh?

#5) More than 75% of Iranians oppose the Mullahs’ continued rule (as per U.S. intel expert John Loftus and the Mullahs’ own polls). If the West really wanted to get rid of the Mullahs, then having 75% of Iranians on your side might be the only geopolitical card necessary to win a “Revolution for Dummies.” Since 1979, have those super-savvy Brits and those superpower Yanks used these overwhelming gambling odds to win the supposedly-sought jackpot in Iran? No??? If the odds are so in favor of winning, then losing the jackpot in Iran for 27 years may have been very difficult for the Brits and the Yanks. Pretty slick, eh?

#6) There are no competent, prominent Iranian leaders to lead a new revolution for regime change in Iran. The Mullahs, Western bankers, and others stole all the money of the exiled son of the former king of Iran. One prominent prospective opposition leader (a satellite TV program host) promised to fly into Tehran in 2004 with a flotilla of 50 planes -- at which time the crazy Mullahs would surely flee Iran in fright (he didn’t – and they didn’t). Prospective Iranian opposition leaders spend much of their time publicly and privately bickering and squabbling about who will lead “regime change” (forget “revolution” – that’s too difficult). These and other fear-and-confusion, divide-and-conquer tactics are privately promoted by the Mullahs’ secret supporters in the West. Pretty slick, eh?

#7) There are viable, promising, but NOT prominent opposition leaders who are ready, willing, and able to lead and to win a new revolution and regime change in Iran (by and for the people of Iran). An indigenously-led regime change strategy would be more effective, more probable, more permanent, less fatal, less destructive, and less costly – with none of disastrous-for-most geopolitical and economic consequences of an attack on Iran by the Brits, Yanks and/or Israelis. However, as you may know, war is a racket.

Supposedly due to item #6, neither the Brits nor Yanks nor Israelis will talk to the anti-Mullah Iranian opposition leaders (who can marshal upwards of 500,000 effective indigenous fighters against the regime in Iran). The Mullahs and their secret Western supporters are prepared for a foreign attack. However, they are not prepared for a regime-changing revolution by substantial numbers, led by Iranians from within Iran.

Bush and Blair talk about U.N. sanctions (counterproductive). In addition, they talk about a military attack on Iran (also counterproductive). But do Bush and Blair talk about issues that will productively motivate a new revolution and regime change in Iran – by and for the people of Iran? What did you say? No??? Pretty slick, eh?

If this analysis is correct, then solutions to the crisis with Iran may be simple. If the people of Iran truly favor regime change, then let them do it – by and for themselves (with a little help from their friends). The people of Iran have more than 500,000 troops in and around Iran who are ready, willing, and able to achieve a new revolution and regime change in Iran – if only the West would get out of the way. The Mullahs and their secret supporters in the West are prepared for a foreign attack, but they are not prepared for a revolution – by and for the people of Iran. After the revolution, Iranians can develop their infrastructure in whatever way they see fit (even with nuclear electric power -- if the people so choose).

Many Muslims and predominantly-Muslim nations are secretly frightened and embarrassed by mad Mahmoud and the crazy Mullahs. Muslim nations will support the people of Iran in getting rid of a threat and an embarrassment to the Muslim world. Jews and Israelis are long-time allies of the Persian people. An Israeli interest in regime change is clear. Jews and Israelis will gladly support the people of Iran. Christians and predominantly-Christian nations do not hate Muslims or the people of Iran. In addition, most Iranians love Americans and what Americans represent. Christians too will help the people of Iran. Russians, Chinese, Japanese, French, Italians, and Germans just want their commercially reasonable contracts to be honored. After a new revolution and regime change in Iran, the people of Iran will be more than happy to honor these commercially reasonable contracts.

Bush, Cheney, and Blair get what they SAY that they want: Regime change in Iran. But they will not be able to have their cake and eat it too. They will not be able to say that they want regime change -- while doing everything possible to delay and prevent it. Not so paradoxically, bombing Iran would help the Mullahs -- just like 9/11 helped Bush & Cheney to solidify polical control over America. Lyndon LaRouche and Jeffrey Steinberg miss this point, and their warnings about a catostrophic bombing of Iran may not only support the Mullahs but also support Bush, Cheney, and Blair -- if any such U.S. bombing is less than catostrophic.

In America, those who are controlling the Iran game have kept the natural allies of regime change in Iran from uniting. If they really knew what was going on, then Democrats and Republicans, the Left and the Right, and anti-Iraq-War and pro-Iraq-War factions might all support a new revolution and regime change in Iran (by and for the people of Iran). But the slick tactics of the Mullahs’ witting and not-so-witting secret supporters in the West have kept them apart.

Since the West cannot lead a new revolution for regime change in Iran, if the West truly wants to get rid of the crazy Mullahs (despite all evidence to the contrary), then the West should either follow or get out of the way.

* * * * * * * * *
Permalink 05/25/06 @ 15:38

Posts by day of the Month

October 2008
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
<<  <   >  >>
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Search

Archive

Newsletter

Your E-mail:

Just Foreign Policy Iraqi Death Estimator





Syndicate this blog XML

What is RSS?

thepeoplesvoice.org

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted articles and information about environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. This news and information is displayed without profit for educational purposes, in accordance with, Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Thepeoplesvoice.org is a non-advocacy internet web site, edited by non-affiliated U.S. citizens. editor

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Valid RSS! Valid Atom! b2evolution