Pages: << 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 1272 >>
Can Reality Any Longer Be Acknowledged?
Paul Craig Roberts
Belaya air base Russia
The attack on Russian strategic forces by Ukraine, with or without President Trump’s knowledge and with or without help from Washington and the British, could have been the most dangerous event in East-West relations during my lifetime. The reason is that recently revised Russian war doctrine states that an attack, even by a non-nuclear country, on the Russian strategic triad requires a strategic response. Strategic usually means nuclear or at least a disabling response.
Putin dodged the responsibility (more later), but no one knew for certain that he would. In other words, whoever is responsible for the attack on Russia’s strategic bombers subjected Ukraine, Europe, the US to the possibility of nuclear attack, depending on whom the Russians decided was responsible. This person or persons is a madman, a maniac who must be identified and removed from his position. Try to imagine how it is possible for, say Zelensky, to launch an attack that could result in nuclear war between the US and Russia. How can control over whether or not the US faces nuclear war be in the hands of Zelensky? If Zelensky is responsible, the US and NATO have a massive failure in command and control. If Trump or someone in the Trump administration gave the green light, they should be removed for committing the most potentially dangerous act during my lifetime.
The Algorithm Hell: Notes from Inside the Censorship-Industrial Cathedral (Escaping Jewgle)
By Chris Spencer
The architecture of censorship in the 21st century is not built of iron bars or smoldering books. It is invisible by design—engineered into the digital substrate of everyday life, encoded in autocomplete predictions, invisible filters, algorithmic nudges. What was once the domain of secret police and book-burning regimes has now been domesticated, consumerized, offered to the public not as repression but as a service: "curated content," "recommended viewing," and "safe results." Now trending idiocy on Google trending. “Tom Thibodeau” is where Google steers you, away from exposés on Gaza, Musk, Ukraine, et al. You brain is being anti-cultured.
Ever feel extreme disgust or anger with Google Bing Youtube? Here is an example of fighting back!. Try using the link and search for everything you know is censored in Google.
If Orwell feared boot-stomping totalitarianism and Huxley warned of a people lulled into docility by pleasure and distraction, we have inherited both dystopias simultaneously. Our overlords don’t bark orders—they tweak metadata. They don’t erase dissent—they demote it. They don’t burn the book—they bury the link. What remains is a social contract mediated not by law or open debate, but by an interface—one that feeds us "authoritative (read: authoritarian) information", wrapped in the soft liturgy of “trust and safety.” Sicilian Protection.
Facebook Shadow Protocols: Web Weaponized Against Palestinian Genocide Discourse
Ned Lud
META/Facebook Censorship Exposed: How Dopamine Hijack, Shadow Bans, and Algorithmic Repression Suppress Palestinian Voices, Accelerate Brain Aging, and Enable Digital Imperialism
Spoiler alert: Not Muslim. Not affiliated with Hamas. And definitely not an Islamophobe. Like Zuckerberg.
This information is backed by reports from organizations such as Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and The Electronic Frontier Foundation.
Imagine a world where information can be freely accessed by anyone due to the advancements in digitalization, however, we currently live in a reality where the web feels more like a dystopian maze filled with propaganda: a world built around concealing the truth and silencing voices of opposition. This is not simply a disagreement of beliefs, but a fundamental redefining of communication as we know it-social media and search engines have been weaponized for control.
This can best be observed in the suffocation of the Palestinian story. Amid rising conflict within the Middle Eastern countries, a powerful let-it-be censorship appears to silence anyone who dares to go against the widely accepted geopolitical narrative. This is not limited to authoritarian countries; so-called liberal marketplace technology corporations entangled with the National Endowment for Democracy (NED, no pun intended) and international nonprofits censor information, be it intentionally or carelessly, becoming the gatekeepers of ‘free speech’.
Watch This New Hollywood Movie About Gaza
 |
| Official Trailer - GAZA: JOURNALISTS UNDER FIRE • BRAVE NEW FILMS (BNF) |
If you displease certain government and military operatives, they WILL threaten you!
By Sally Dugman
If you displease certain government and military operatives, they WILL attack you !
I don’t write under my true legal name. Doing so, I found out, is a liability and a potential danger. How do I know?
Before Bush Jr.’s war in Iraq when the war frenzy for it was being purposefully whipped up, I knew that the war (as Alan Greenspan later confirmed) was all about gaining control of Iraqi oil, as well as destabilizing Iraq enough to dominate the broken country, as well as gain power in Middle Eastern political and economic affairs.
So sick at heart and distraught from the war having started, I wrote articles about those aims being the case as soon as the slaughtering invasion by the U.S. military was well underway.
Then in response to one of my writings posted on an internationally viewed website, a bunch of U.S. Marines wrote comments that that they knew where I live and proved it was so that they had somehow found my address. Then, they wrote that they were coming after me and to my home in order to kill me as they hated my views about their war!
Law, Not Crime, Has Come From South of the Border
By David Swanson, World BEYOND War
Not so much criminals as the foundations of the rule of law — that is what has infiltrated the United States from Latin America. That seems to be a major thread running through Greg Grandin’s wonderful new history of the hemisphere, America, América: A New History of the New World. It’s a book you can dive back into repeatedly, not to mention fantasize about someone compacting it into a short slideshow for the benefit of the President of the United States.
British settler colonists in North America had their preachers and writers, but those individuals had a tendency to pretend Native Americans were not real, did not exist, perhaps never had existed, or simply didn’t count for much on empty land, or didn’t count because they were to be pushed out or eliminated rather than lived with. Spain, in contrast, generated a tremendous raging debate between supporters and denouncers of its killing, robbery, theft, enslavement, and terrorizing of indigenous people. Spain broke new ground, according to Grandin, in producing criticism of its own atrocities as it conquered South America.
The Ivy League and Multinationals of Atrocity: How Elite Universities and Tech Oligarchs Whitewash Algorithmic Genocide
Tracy Turner
Prologue: The Ivory Tower's Shadow — Algorithmic Genocide's Quiet Architects
In the rarefied air of America's most hallowed halls—Harvard's crimson cloisters, Columbia's venerable lecture rooms, USC's sprawling research labs—there simmers a sinister symbiosis. Behind polished façades of academic inquiry and innovation, a darker truth festers: these institutions are not mere sanctuaries of knowledge but incubators and laundries of algorithmic genocide. Cloaked in the antiseptic language of "data science," "artificial intelligence," and "decision intelligence," they funnel billions in grants, fellowships, and research contracts that serve not the cause of human progress but the machinery of mass oppression and digital ethnic cleansing.
The Halls of Genocide are the Ivy League of Atrocity, where elite universities, tethered to a sprawling network of military contractors and tech oligarchs—Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Palantir, Lockheed Martin, Raytheon—sanitize and weaponize the very algorithms that determine life and death in conflict zones from Gaza to Xinjiang. Here, the tendrils of the Talpiot Program's ruthless AI vision extend beyond Israel's borders into the sterile corridors of MIT and Stanford, where predictive targeting becomes research, autonomous kill chains become thesis topics, and ethnic profiling algorithms are dressed up as cutting-edge innovation.
Getting Realistic And Sensible About Maladaptive Behaviors
By Sally Dugman
Feeding 9 Billion | National Geographic
“Picture of (a) pig farm in Mato Grosso, Brazil, with sows confined …” (Presumably, they can’t stand, nor move. Stuck in one position, they are forced to lie on one side to nurse after being artificially inseminated. They do so day after day, week after week and month after month despite the discomfort of being heavy in weight and forced to retain one single position for so long. Then they are either used to breed a new set of piglets, which will be used the same way in the future if females or brought to the slaughterhouse, as are the males of their offspring except for the few that look like top breeders for desired traits, that will be milked for sperm. … Are these creatures considered intelligent animals – animals as smart as dogs? No, they are simply commodities to make ever higher profits. … Do you imagine that the farm workers are paid fairly for their hard work or do you imagine the farm owners garnering the brunt of the earnings regardless of whatever they may or may not do work-wise to support the farm from which lavish wealth can be gained for them? … This is my understanding, wholly correct or not, when I see such a photo as this one. – S. D.)
Lavender Protocol: The Algorithm That Kills by Proxy
Robert David
Image courtesy https://asktheman.xyz/
How a Silent AI War Machine Was Engineered by Tech Giants, Funded by States, and Taught and Researched in Ivy Halls.
The Cold Arithmetic of Cyber Execution
In the age of digital dominion, where death can be calculated by an algorithm and accountability buried beneath code, a new species of warfare has quietly emerged—faceless, data-driven, and morally anesthetized. It does not march on the battlefield with banners or tanks but instead pulses through fiber-optic veins and GPU clusters, making life-or-death decisions at the speed of light. This is the Lavender Protocol.
What began as an obscure node within Israel’s vast military-tech nexus—reportedly used to identify and execute human targets in Gaza based on algorithmic profiling—has metastasized into something more insidious: a global doctrine of proxy killing, developed and deployed not just by nation-states, but by the corporate and academic aristocracy of our time. Lavender is not just a system. It is a theology of technical omnipotence. And it is spreading.
Religion and Brutality Addressed
By Sally Dugman
Quite some years ago, I overheard some theology students in a hot debate. Some of them were claiming that God could only be two of three traits — a triad — assigned to him. It went like this:
If God were all seeing, all powerful and all loving — he, she, it or they wouldn’t allow evil (brutality, murder and related “bad” behaviors) to take place. However and if God were all seeing and all powerful, but not all loving, he wouldn’t care about whom were getting brutalized and killed off prematurely.
Likewise if God were all seeing and all loving, but not all powerful — God might not be able to fix about wrongful actions taking place. So the world could still be vicious and God would not address it as such.
