By Robert Singer
The PakAlert Press, and other popular 9/11 conspiracy websites controlled by the CIA, and known for promoting the controlled demolition theory of the Twin Towers, i.e., an Inside Job, as 9/18/2010 has the following headline: [1]
Pictures Prove Mini Nukes Caused 9-11 Devastation
Posted on PakAlert on September 18, 2010 // 8 Comments
(http://www.pakalertpress.com/2010/09/18/pictures-prove-mini-nukes-caused-9-11-devastation/) and Proven 9-11 Nukes = US Government Involvement
These recent articles at PakAlert CONTRADICT their previous position that 9/11 was an Israeli Inside Job (Israeli connection, 9/11, ALL THE PROOF IN THE WORLD!!) and they now proclaim loudly:
This understanding means we cannot blame the highly unconventional Ground Zero devastation on thermite/thermate/super thermate and “controlled demolition” any more than we can blame it on “jet fuel” or “box cutters.”
Even a child can see there is something wrong with these pictures.
A=Controlled Demolition of a hotel, B=North Tower, C=Hiroshima.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
However, before getting on the mini-nuke/Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) bridge-to-nowhere, ask yourself this question:
If PakAlert is suddenly promoting the mini-nuke/Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) story featuring Judy Wood (previously marginalized and isolated from the 9/11 Truth Movement and considered a Kook [2]), there can only be two possibilities:
Option 1. Mini Nukes and Judy Wood are the truth. The CIA now, after years of promoting 9/11 Truth (mis/disinformation) admit:
And on September 18, 2010, The Powers That Be (TPTB, a non-conspiracy acronym [3]) had a change of heart (or maybe grew a conscience) and directed their agents, in this case PakAlert and the CIA, to tell the common man the "truth" about what really happened: that is, it was mini-nuke/Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) instead of controlled demolition that cause the Twin Towers to collapse on 9/11. Unlikely. Click here to read a 9-point refutation of the idea that nuclear devices were used to destroy the WTC buildings.
All you can say about a theory of Mini-nukes and Space Beam weapons is that it is a possible explanation, but that doesn't mean it's true. In fact, the recent disclosure from the CIA-controlled sites, who replaced an impossible explanation of the collapse with a plausible explanation, should alert everyone the Mini-nukes and the Space Beam weapon story (for WTC 1 & 2) cannot be true.
Dr. Judy Wood's research confirms a DEW was used to make the impact holes in the Twin Towers and to demolish WTC 7 (without making a sound) but a DEW explanation cannot explain the collapse of the Twin Towers because:
WTC 7 was a bottom-up a gravity-assisted collapse with a small debris field, while WTC 1 and 2 were primarily top-down, virtually unassisted by gravity and showered debris in a wide radius as their frames essentially "peeled" outward. FEMA: WTC Study, Ch. 5 (05/02) [4]
Option 2. The mini-nukes/DEW is the new story behind the story, behind the story of how the World Trade Center I and II collapsed (highly probable).
By Robert Singer
The PakAlert Press, and other popular 9/11 conspiracy websites controlled by the CIA, and known for promoting the controlled demolition theory of the Twin Towers, i.e., an Inside Job, as 9/18/2010 has the following headline: [1]
Pictures Prove Mini Nukes Caused 9-11 Devastation
Posted on PakAlert on September 18, 2010 // 8 Comments
(http://www.pakalertpress.com/2010/09/18/pictures-prove-mini-nukes-caused-9-11-devastation/) and Proven 9-11 Nukes = US Government Involvement
These recent articles at PakAlert CONTRADICT their previous position that 9/11 was an Israeli Inside Job (Israeli connection, 9/11, ALL THE PROOF IN THE WORLD!!) and they now proclaim loudly:
This understanding means we cannot blame the highly unconventional Ground Zero devastation on thermite/thermate/super thermate and “controlled demolition” any more than we can blame it on “jet fuel” or “box cutters.”
Even a child can see there is something wrong with these pictures.
A=Controlled Demolition of a hotel, B=North Tower, C=Hiroshima.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
However, before getting on the mini-nuke/Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) bridge-to-nowhere, ask yourself this question:
If PakAlert is suddenly promoting the mini-nuke/Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) story featuring Judy Wood (previously marginalized and isolated from the 9/11 Truth Movement and considered a Kook [2]), there can only be two possibilities:
Option 1. Mini Nukes and Judy Wood are the truth. The CIA now, after years of promoting 9/11 Truth (mis/disinformation) admit:
And on September 18, 2010, The Powers That Be (TPTB, a non-conspiracy acronym [3]) had a change of heart (or maybe grew a conscience) and directed their agents, in this case PakAlert and the CIA, to tell the common man the "truth" about what really happened: that is, it was mini-nuke/Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) instead of controlled demolition that cause the Twin Towers to collapse on 9/11. Unlikely. Click here to read a 9-point refutation of the idea that nuclear devices were used to destroy the WTC buildings.
All you can say about a theory of Mini-nukes and Space Beam weapons is that it is a possible explanation, but that doesn't mean it's true. In fact, the recent disclosure from the CIA-controlled sites, who replaced an impossible explanation of the collapse with a plausible explanation, should alert everyone the Mini-nukes and the Space Beam weapon story (for WTC 1 & 2) cannot be true.
Dr. Judy Wood's research confirms a DEW was used to make the impact holes in the Twin Towers and to demolish WTC 7 (without making a sound) but a DEW explanation cannot explain the collapse of the Twin Towers because:
WTC 7 was a bottom-up a gravity-assisted collapse with a small debris field, while WTC 1 and 2 were primarily top-down, virtually unassisted by gravity and showered debris in a wide radius as their frames essentially "peeled" outward. FEMA: WTC Study, Ch. 5 (05/02) [4]
Option 2. The mini-nukes/DEW is the new story behind the story, behind the story of how the World Trade Center I and II collapsed (highly probable).