By Gary G. Kohls, MD

At the end of this article is the abstract of a recently published Drug Safety article that came out of an HHS, NIH, NIAID-funded study that actually acknowledges – contrary to the Big Pharma establishment-approved narrative - the existence of vaccine-induced neurotoxicity (especially vaccine-induced encephalopathy resulting in childhood seizure disorders) and other adverse toxic effects following the cocktails of vaccines that are routinely injected during routine well child exams, vaccines that always contain numbers of toxic ingredients, which have never been studied for safety when given in cocktails of more than one shot at a time.

One of the authors of the journal article (Martin Kulldorff) is also a signatory and defender of the allegedly ”controversial” Great Barrington Declaration (https://gbdeclaration.org/) that logically and scientifically encourages nations to allow natural herd immunity to develop against the SARS-CoV-2 virus (a la Sweden’s remarkably successful no-lock-down program, despite massive Big Pharma-generated attempts to discredit Sweden’s scientifically-logical approach) rather than continuing the failed economy- and job-destroying regional/national lock-downs that have been imposed until FDA-approval of two or more of the potentially lethal cocktails and booster shots of coronavirus vaccines that will NOT be proven for-long-term-safety or short or long-term efficacy because they are all being pseudo-scientifically fast-tracked through the FDA approval process.

Kulldorff made a valiant attempt to defend the Great Barrington Declaration (which I have also signed) on the October 15, 2020 Democracy Now program. The interview had obviously been orchestrated to sabotage Kulldorff and the allegedly “controversial” Declaration by the two Democracy Now interviewers (plus an academic professor of Public Health “panel member” that sounded like a Big Pharma shill).

The three adversaries took turns trying to discredit Kulldorff, the Declaration and the concept of natural herd immunity. But they also tried – and failed - to promote a so-called “vaccine-induced herd immunity”, which is an impossibility, given the well-established medical fact that only a natural infection with a virus is capable of stimulating both cellular/mucosal immunity and humoral/serological immunity against that virus simultaneously.

True science-based, unbiased vaccinologists are those that do not have conflicts of financial interest or career-enhancing interest when working for profiteering Big Vaccine corporations or government Public Health bureaucracies. These honorable “expert” scientists that are only searching for the truth when performing their scientific endeavors know that the highly abnormal intramuscular injection of a lab-produced viral antigen – with the toxic preservatives and adjuvants that are always in vaccines - can only temporarily (and often dangerously) hyper-stimulate the humeral/serological immune system.

The humeral/serological immune system that produces antibodies is the only part of a much more complex, two-part immune system that is being talked about in the massive propaganda campaigns being imposed upon us these days. It is only – at best - capable of theoretically producing uncertain amounts of not-necessarily-specific, short-lived antibodies to one of the many proteins that are located on the surfaces of viruses.

This difference between the two mechanisms of natural immunity has been succinctly explained in the following quotation that expresses truly science-based wisdom (something that used to be taught in medical schools when I was a student - before the pharmaceutical industry gradually and steadily took control of both clinical and academic medicine).

Something in my medical training has caused me to understand that any injected vaccine is incapable of positively affecting one’s innate cellular/mucosal immune system.

The quote below comes from Dr Harold Buttram’s forward to Neil Z. Miller’s important book, Vaccines: Are They Really Safe and
Effective?

“The human immune system is divided into two major classes:

1) Cellular/mucosal Immunity (for which injected vaccines do absolutely nothing, except to weaken the immune system, thanks to the cellular toxins that are in all vaccines, such as aluminum, mercury, polysorbate 80 and other preservatives or adjuvants), is located in the mucous membranes of the gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts and their respective lymph nodes, and

2) Humoral Immunity, with production of antigen-specific antibodies by plasma cells in the bone marrow.

“For eons of time the mucous membranes of the gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts have been the primary sites of infectious microbe entry into the body so that, of necessity, cellular/mucosal immunity has evolved as the primary defense system, with humoral immunity serving a secondary or backup role… Vaccines are reversing these roles, attempting to substitute vaccine-induced humoral immunity for the far more efficient cellular/mucosal immunity, the latter in turn undergoing a process of “atrophy of disuse” as a result of this (vaccine-induced) role-switching.” -- Harold Buttram, MD

Scientists, physicians, epidemiologists, bureaucrats, policy-makers, politicians, journalists, etc who intentionally ignore the science of natural herd immunity and instead advocate for the uncertain, dangerous, temporary, partial, short-term immunity promised by shot-in-the-dark coronavirus vaccines must be thought of as Big Pharma shills.

The members of the above groups that are ignorant of the science of natural herd immunity are likely just gullible victims of the pervasive propaganda campaign that has been so successfully orchestrated by the extremely wealthy and influential vaccine industry, the billionaire shareholders of pharmaceutical corporations in the World Economic Forum, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (and its proclaimed de-population agenda), Wall Street investors in Big Pharma stocks, politicians that are beholden to their corporate campaign donors and the compliant media that accepts advertising and sponsorships from Big Pharma.

These facilitators of the lock-down-induced crises need to stop being so didactic and one-sided about COVID-19.

Journalists especially need to start doing investigative journalism again. But first they need to somehow apologize for intentionally (or, in some cases, unintentionally) misleading their listeners. And journalists need to refrain from ever again being so compliant with the agendas of the various sociopathic corporations that are constantly trying to rule the parts of the world that they don’t already rule (such as the multibillionaires in the World Economic Forum –
www.wef.org).

And every concerned citizen (especially physicians) needs to acquire some basic knowledge of the true sciences of vaccinology, virology and immunology – but they must only pay attention to those “experts” that have no economic conflicts of interest with the pharmaceutical industry (ie, those truly unbiased scientists that have been black-listed from the media ever since October of 2019, when the World Economic Forum, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health and the Gates Foundation put on the tabletop spectacle called Event 201, which primed the world‘s policy-makers on what to do when (not if) a world-wide pandemic caused by a novel coronavirus would occur.

For much more on these topics, there are any number of wonderful websites. For starters, go to Robert Kennedy, Jr’s Children’s Health Defense website at
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/; Del Bigtree’s HighWire interview program at
https://thehighwire.com/; or Barbara Loe Fisher’s National Vaccine Information Center at
www.nvic.org; or Dr Joseph Mercola’s website at
https://vaccines.mercola.com/
or Dr Reiner Fuellmich’s testimony about the findings of his German Corona Investigative Committee as to what entities were behind the various lockdowns that have devastated the world’s economy:

To access Dr Fuellmich’s powerful video speech, click on one of these sites, or just do a search with the title: "Reiner Fuellmich - Crimes Against Humanity":
https://www.bitchute.com/video/kZAHIhkF6GuQ/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkqW59U8KYw

_______

Drug Saf 2020 Oct;43(10):1057-1065.

Determining Which of Several Simultaneously Administered Vaccines Increase Risk of an Adverse Event

Shirley V Wang , et al

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32613596/

Full article available at https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v43y2020i10d10.1007_s40264-020-00967-8.html

Abstract

Introduction: Childhood immunization schedules often involve multiple vaccinations per visit. When increased risk of an adverse event is observed after simultaneous (same-day) vaccinations, it can be difficult to ascertain which triggered the adverse event. This methods paper discusses a systematic process to determine which of the simultaneously administered vaccine(s) are most likely to have caused an observed increase in risk of an adverse event.

Methods: We use an example from the literature where excess risk of seizure was observed 1 day after vaccination, but same-day vaccination patterns made it difficult to discern which vaccine(s) may trigger the adverse event. We illustrate the systematic identification process using a simulation that retained the observed pattern of simultaneous vaccination in an empirical cohort of vaccinated children. We simulated "true" effects for diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (DTaP) and pneumococcal conjugate (PCV) on risk of seizure the day after vaccination. We varied the independent and interactive effects of vaccines (on the multiplicative scale). After applying the process to simulated data, we evaluated risk of seizure 1 day after vaccination in the empirical cohort.

Results: In all simulations, we were able to determine which vaccines contributed to excess risk. In the empirical data, we narrowed the association with seizure from all vaccines in the schedule to three likely candidates, DTaP, PCV, and/or Haemophilus influenzae type B (HiB) (p < 0.01, attributable risk when all three were administered together: five per 100,000). Disentangling their associations with seizure would require a larger sample or more variation in the combinations administered. When none of these three were administered, no excess risk was observed.

Conclusion: The process outlined could provide valuable information on the magnitude of potential risk from individual and simultaneous vaccinations. Associations should be further investigated with independent data as well as biologically based, statistically independent hypotheses.

-###-

Dr Gary G. Kohls lives in the USA and writes a weekly column for the Duluth Reader, Duluth, Minnesota’s alternative newsweekly magazine. He is a past member of Mind Freedom International, the International Center for the Study of Psychiatry and Psychology and the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. His Duty to Warn columns have been re-published around the world for the last decade. They deal frequently with Big Vaccine’s over-vaccinating, Big Medicine’s over-screening, over-diagnosing and over-treating agendas. Many of Dr Kohls’ columns have been archived at: http://duluthreader.com/search?search_term=Duty+to+Warn&p=2