« Senate Caves on Fast TrackWhy are some Lebanese Sunni Muslims becoming sympathetic toward Da’ish (ISIS)? »

Irresponsible Iran Bashing

June 27th, 2015

by Stephen Lendman

The world's number one human rights abuser on a global scale annually publishes individual country reports excluding itself. One-sided bias describes how Washington views independent governments it wants replaced by ones it controls - vilifying them irresponsibly.

Its latest 2014 Iran human rights report contains a litany of exaggerations, misinformation and Big Lies.

Included are false claims of speech, press, religion and assembly restrictions, disappearances, arbitrary arrests and detentions, torture, murder, denial of free elections, due process and judicial fairness, anti-Semitism among other misreported allegations listed.

It's not surprising. US hostility toward Iran is longstanding. Nothing in prospect suggests change. A June 30 P5+1 nuclear talks deadline approaches.

Iran wants its legitimate rights respected. It wants to be treated no differently from dozens of other countries with peaceful nuclear programs.

It justifiably resents being unjustly accused of possibly wanting nuclear weapons when no evidence suggests it. Plenty shows its program has no military component or a desire to have one.

At the same time, America's nuclear arsenal and Israel's threaten world peace. Real dangers are ignored - fabricated ones hyped.

US media scoundrels regurgitate the usual Big Lies about Iran - instead of explaining things accurately.

New York Times editors notoriously bash Iran irresponsibly. Their latest broadside headlined "Ayatollah Khamenei's Fateful Choice, saying:

Iranians "are jeopardizing the nuclear agreement that would benefit them and the security of the region."

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei "stiffen(ed) his hard line against concessions…(won't) abide any long-term freeze on Iran's 'sensitive nuclear work'…ruled out foreign inspections of Iranian military sites…insist(s) all economic sanctions be lifted immediately…and" won't allow IAEA inspections.

Fact: Washington bears full responsibility for "jeopardizing" a nuclear agreement and undermining regional security.

Fact: Khamenei wants Iran's legitimate nuclear rights respected. His latest comments are no different from earlier ones.

Fact: Tehran's so-called "sensitive work" is legal, NPT-permitted nuclear research.

Fact: No nation allows inspections of its military facilities and others related to national security.

Fact: Iran cooperates fully with IAEA inspectors. At the same time, Khomenei justifiably criticized the agency as being politicized - "not (being) an independent and fair body…"

He said "Iranian authorities, while insisting on (the nation's) red lines, are pursuing a good deal, which is fair and honorable in line with Iran's interests."

America wants its nuclear program marginalized and weakened in its current legitimate form, he explained.

It wants pressure and "cruel sanctions" maintained. Khomenei insists they all be lifted immediately when a deal is consummated. They never should have been imposed in the first place. They're illegitimate under international law.

"The lifting of sanctions must not be contingent on the implementation of Iran’s undertakings," Khomenei said.

"They should not say (Iran) should fulfill (its) commitments and the (IAEA) should then verify it in order for the sanctions to be lifted. We do not accept this issue at all."

Times editors lied claiming his comments diverged from April's framework agreement. Nothing he said indicates disagreement or change from what he said many times before.

Washington keeps reinterpreting Lausanne, lifting the bar irresponsibly, then blaming Iran for refusing to accept changes to agreed on terms.

Times editors ludicrously suggested Khomenei possibly "has no intention of accepting any nuclear agreement with the West."

He'll have to "live with the economic and political consequences if he sabotages this deal," they said.

For decades, Iran sought normalized relations with Washington and other Western nations. It seeks mutual cooperation with all nations.

It wants conflict with none. It wants its legitimate rights respected. It wants isolating efforts by the West ended.

It's up against the power and influence of Israel, its lobby and America's corrupt Congress wanting final say on any nuclear deal - suggesting opposition to whatever Israel won't accept, a sure deal-killer irresponsibly blamed on Iran if differences aren't resolved.

-###-

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

His new book as editor and contributor is titled "Flashpoint in Ukraine: How the US Drive for Hegemony Risks World War III".

http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanIII.html

Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com.

Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.

It airs three times weekly: live on Sundays at 1PM Central time plus two prerecorded archived programs

Tags: iran

No feedback yet

Voices

Voices

  • Tracy Turner SMELE's (Slow-Motion-Extinction-Level-Events). Not yet common in academia, but it should be. I. Introduction: The Timebombs We Ignore "Not with a bang but a bureaucratic shrug, the world ends." - Revisionist reading of Eliot by the…
  • By David Swanson I wish U.S. academics would spend less time fantasizing choices between various murders with trollies, or playing games with theories about how greedy robots might do diplomacy, and more time on the impeachment problem. The United…
  • Cathy Smith Hidden Bombshells in Trump’s “Big Bodacious Pill” “The most dangerous place to be is between power and its reckoning.” —Rewritten maxim of Beltway survival In the dark guts of Trump’s 2025 legislative monolith—cheekily christened the Big…
  • Robert David A global exposé of how corporations distort science, erase truth, and turn human death into quarterly growth. I. Introduction: When Truth Becomes a Liability In an age when algorithms dictate belief and lobbyists author legislation, truth…
  • Robert David Polluters don’t just dump toxins. They dump stories—engineered by billion-dollar PR firms. They Poisoned the Planet—Then Hired Spin Doctors to Make You Forget When a chemical spill poisons a town, when a pipeline ruptures in a fireball,…
  • By David Swanson, World BEYOND War Switzerland got that way through NEUTRALITY Remarks at Neutrality Colloquium: A Call to Action for Active Neutrality & World Peace, June 26-27, 2025 in Geneva, Switzerland. I grew up in a town in the United States that…
  • Fred Gransville I. The Fluoride Question For decades, fluoride has had an uncontested official story: it is a beneficial, even benevolent substance—vital to healthy teeth. In toothpaste tubes to water supplies, fluoride has been presented as a dental…
  • Tracy Turner #SCOTUScorruption #FascistAmerica #EndCitizensUnited Bush started it. Obama enabled it. Trump perfected it. And the Court? It never checked power—it built it. I. Opening Jab: The Judicial Illusion "They wear robes to appear impartial. But…
  • Dr. Vladislav B. Sotirovic Carl von Clausewitz The focal questions about war In dealing with both theoretical and practical points of view about war, at least six fundamental questions arise: 1) What is war?; 2) What types of war exist?; 3) Why do wars…
  • By Tracy Turner What begins as an assault on immigrants ends as an assault on the Constitution itself. The Constitution Is Not a Loophole Come the summer of 2025, the sitting president of America is pushing the limits of constitutional tolerance yet…
July 2025
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

  XML Feeds

Advanced CMS
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted articles and information about environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. This news and information is displayed without profit for educational purposes, in accordance with, Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Thepeoplesvoice.org is a non-advocacy internet web site, edited by non-affiliated U.S. citizens. editor
ozlu Sozler GereksizGercek Hava Durumu Firma Rehberi Hava Durumu Firma Rehberi E-okul Veli Firma Rehberi