Fear Is Eroding American Rights
Paul Craig Roberts
The power of irrational fear in the US is extraordinary. It ranks up there with the Israel Lobby, the military/security complex, and the financial gangsters. Indeed, fear might be the most powerful force in America.
Americans are at ease with their country’s aggression against Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan, which has resulted in a million dead Muslim civilians and several million refugees, because the US government has filled Americans with fear of terrorists. "We have to kill them over there before they come over here."
Fearful of American citizens, the US government is building concentration camps apparently all over the country. According to news reports, a $385 million US government contract was given by the Bush/Cheney Regime to Cheney’s company, Halliburton, to build "detention centers" in the US. The corporate media never explained for whom the detention centers are intended.
Most Americans dismiss such reports. "It can’t happen here." However, in north-eastern Florida not far from Tallahassee, I have seen what might be one of these camps. There is a building inside a huge open area fenced with razor wire. There is no one there and no signs. The facility appears new and unused and does not look like an abandoned prisoner work camp. What is it for? Who spent all that money for what?
PermalinkThe Case for Disbarment of Lawyers Who Facilitated Torture Grows
By Kevin Zeese
Lawyers were the lynchpin if they had given real legal advice: torture is illegal under domestic and international law; there would have been no torture program.
Since filing complaints against 12 Bush-Cheney lawyers the case for disbarment has gotten stronger. More information is leaking out. And, more and more Americans from citizens to generals to a former president are speaking out. On June 10th, a coalition of hundreds of organizations filled an addendum to the complaints against these lawyers to highlight the new information.
The addendum included statements by two generals with first hand knowledge of what occurred in U.S. detention centers in Iraq and Afghanistan. General David Patraeus said on May 29th that the U.S. violated the Geneva Conventions in carrying out “enhanced interrogations.” On FOX TV, in response to a question about the controversial interrogation practices, Patraeus said:
The CIA 500
Friends of Liberty
The following is a list of alledged and/or suspected C.I.A. "front" companies, corporations, or organizations. The list was compiled by Dr. Julius Mader of East Berlin. Although Dr. Mader claims to be an independant researcher, there is reason to belive he is employed by the Soviet intelligence service, i.e., the K.G.B. Mader's work is printed in many expected Communist bloc intelligence journals and when he lists a group or corporation there is good reason to check them out...which is what everyone reading this list should do in the various localities. Because an organization is listed doesn't necessarily mean everyone in the organi- zation is Agency...but they may have been influenced, supported or indi- rectly controlled by the C.I.A. For example, CBS-TV is listed...CBS once had interlocking directorates with the Rand Corporation. For the first time anywhere in the world, a documented list (alphabetically arranged) provides information on over 500 camouflaged or subsidised organizations of the U.S. secret intelligence network on five continents. The following documentation contains, in particular:
Clearing up myths about the EFCA
Mary Shaw
I was talking with a friend recently, and the subject of the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) came up. This friend says he is pro-union, but opposes the EFCA because, he said, it would require workers to openly sign a petition for a union prior to a secret ballot election.
A minimum number of petition signatures would be required first, he said, to move the union possibility forward to the secret ballot election. He thought this additional step was unnecessary and not a good idea. He was pro-secret-ballot, but not for open signatures.
Obama’s Doublespeak on Iran
Ismael Hossein-zadeh
On the US-Iran relationship, President Obama seems to be talking from both sides of his mouth. From one side we hear promising messages of dialogue and a “new beginning” with Iran; from the other side provocative words that seems to be coming right out of the mouth of his predecessor, George W. Bush.
For example, on the occasion of the Iranian New Year in March, while the President expressed willingness for “engagement that is honest and grounded in mutual respect" he also warned Iran that it cannot "take its rightful place in the community of nations … through terror or arms.”
XML Feeds
